2006
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2006.062372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and risk factors of discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis using spine and hip bone densitometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Very few individuals had normal status at one site and osteoporosis at the other site. Similar results regarding major discordance between the hip and spine have been reported by others [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Very few individuals had normal status at one site and osteoporosis at the other site. Similar results regarding major discordance between the hip and spine have been reported by others [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In addition, a physiologic discordance between different skeletal sites could be related to the skeleton's natural adaptive reaction to physiological exogenous and endogenous influencing factors (39). Mechanical strain especially related to weight bearing plays a key role in this kind of discordance (40). Moreover, trabecular sites (such the lumbar spine) are known to have a more rapid rate of bone loss during the early postmenopause than cortical sites (like the proximal femur) (39-41).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that T-score discordance can affect diagnosis and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis [9][10][11][12][13][14]. Inconsistencies in the diagnostic classification between skeletal sites also can be present in premenopausal women.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%