Prevalence and risk factors of acne scars in patients with acne vulgaris

Liu, Lin; Xue, Yuzhou; Chen, Yangmei; Chen, Tingqiao; Zhong, Judan; Shao, Xinyi; Chen, Jin

doi:10.1111/srt.13386

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The prevalence of acne vulgaris observed in our study cohort underscores the condition's significance as a public health issue within the Saudi population. Comparatively, the prevalence rate is consistent with findings from other regions, suggesting that acne vulgaris remains a ubiquitous challenge, transcending geographic and cultural boundaries [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Notably, our analysis identified a strong association between acne prevalence and specific lifestyle factors, including high intake of fast foods, reduced sleep duration, and low physical activity levels.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Impact of Lifestyle and Dietary Habits on the Prevalence of Acne Vulgaris: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia

Khormi,

Aldubayyan,

Hakami

et al. 2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Acne vulgaris is a prevalent dermatological condition worldwide, with its impact significantly influenced by various genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. Despite its global prevalence, data on acne’s prevalence and risk factors in Saudi Arabia remain sparse. This study aims to fill this gap by examining the prevalence of acne vulgaris and identifying associated lifestyle and environmental risk factors within the Saudi population. Methodology Employing a cross-sectional survey-based design, this study collected data from a representative sample of the Saudi population aged 18 years and older. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling and completed a self-administered online questionnaire covering demographic information, lifestyle factors, and acne history. Statistical analyses, including descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression, were utilized to identify significant risk factors associated with acne vulgaris. Results The survey, completed by 1,983 participants, revealed a diverse age distribution with a slight predominance of the 21-25-year age group (32.5%). Gender distribution was nearly balanced (52% female, 48% male), and the majority were single (67.3%). Lifestyle assessments indicated varied water intake, with a significant portion consuming less than 1-2 L per day. Sleep duration for most fell within the 5-7 hours range. Fast food consumption was frequent among 24% of respondents, and physical activity levels showed 40% of participants exercised minimally. Notably, 72% reported a history of acne, predominantly beginning between ages 16 and 20. Acne was mainly mild to moderate in severity and primarily affected the face. Treatment was sought by 60%, with a preference for topical solutions. Awareness around acne causes was moderate, with a high consensus on the impact of stress and diet on acne development. Conclusions Acne vulgaris in Saudi Arabia is significantly associated with various modifiable lifestyle factors, suggesting that interventions focusing on lifestyle modifications may be effective in managing and preventing acne. This study advocates for the integration of lifestyle counseling into acne treatment protocols, offering a holistic approach to managing this pervasive condition.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 88%

Impact of Lifestyle and Dietary Habits on the Prevalence of Acne Vulgaris: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia

Khormi,

Aldubayyan,

Hakami

et al. 2024

Cureus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Early intervention and effective therapy in managing acne are crucial to reduce acne scarring based on these findings. 3 The study of Lofti et al. investigates the efficacy of a combined treatment, utilizing radiofrequency‐assisted subcision and polycaprolactone‐based dermal fillers, for managing atrophic post‐acne scars, demonstrating significant improvements in various acne lesion types but suggesting the need for larger randomized clinical trials for more conclusive findings.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

An innovative microcoring technology: A novel approach to acne scar treatment

Ahn,

Kim,

Pamela

et al. 2024

Skin Research and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundAcne scars present a complex challenge in dermatology and cosmetics, despite advancements in technological interventions such as fractional lasers, microneedling, and surgical procedures. Effective treatment remains elusive for many individuals. ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the efficacy of rotational fractional resection using 1 mm diameter rotating scalpels as a primary treatment for icepick and boxcar scars on the cheeks and glabella region.MethodsThree patients with acne scars underwent a single treatment session of rotational fractional resection. Evaluation occurred at the 2‐month post‐treatment mark to assess improvements in scar appearance and potential skin‐related side effects.ResultsFollowing the treatment, significant improvements were observed in the targeted acne scars. Notable enhancements were noted without major skin‐related adverse effects, except for minor suture marks.ConclusionThe outcomes of this study underscore the potential of rotational fractional resection as an innovative and effective approach in treating acne scars. This single‐session cosmetic procedure shows promise in yielding lasting and quantifiable results, offering a hopeful solution for individuals seeking comprehensive acne scar treatment.

show abstract

“…Acne vulgaris is a common skin condition especially in adolescents affecting 95–100% of boys and 83–85% of girls, and in 12–14% of cases it persists into adulthood. 1 , 2 Scar is considered one of the permanent complications of acne, resulting from the destruction of collagen fibers and subcutaneous fat, and affect up to 95% of acne patients, depending on the severity and delay in starting treatment. 3 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of cross‐linked and non‐cross‐linked hyaluronic acid in combination with botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial

Behrangi,

Dehghani,

Sheikhzadeh

et al. 2024

Skin Research and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionAcne vulgaris is a common skin condition that affects a significant percentage of adolescents, with scarring being one of its permanent complications. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of using botulinum toxin type A (BTA) in combination with cross‐linked and non‐cross‐linked hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of atrophic acne scars.MethodOur study is a randomized, double‐blind clinical trial conducted on 16 patients with atrophic acne scars. The patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group received a single session of BTA and crossed link HA combination, while the other group received two sessions of BTA and non‐crossed link HA, 1 month apart. The patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months after baseline to evaluate the number and area of fine and large pores and spots, scar grading, patient satisfaction, and complications.ResultsThe mean age of individuals in both the cross‐linked HA and non‐cross‐linked HA groups was 32.75 ± 4.26 and 31.50 ± 8.48 years, respectively (p = 0.71). In terms of gender, three (37.5%) and seven (87.5%) individuals in the cross‐linked and non‐cross‐linked HA groups were female, respectively (p = 0.11). There were no significant differences in the count and area of fine and large pores and spots between the two groups at baseline and the first follow‐up session. However, in the second follow‐up session, the non‐cross‐linked HA group had significantly better results than the cross‐linked HA group in terms of large pores count and area (p = 0.01). In terms of changes over time, the non‐cross‐linked HA group showed significantly better improvements in the count and area of large pores compared to the cross‐linked HA group (p = 0.03). Additionally, both groups experienced a significant decrease in the count and area of fine pores over time (p = 0.001), but the amount of changes was not statistically significant between the two groups (p = 0.06). Concerning acne grade, initially, 62.5% and 12.5% of cases in the cross‐linked HA and non‐cross‐linked HA groups, respectively, had severe grades. However, in the last session, these percentages significantly decreased to 0% for both groups (p = 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). In terms of treatment complications, none of the patients experienced any adverse effects.ConclusionThe study demonstrated that both cross‐linked HA and non‐cross‐linked HA were effective in reducing acne severity and improving the appearance of pores and spots. The treatments had similar effects on fine pores, spots, and overall acne severity. However, non‐cross‐linked HA appeared to have a better result on large pores compared to cross‐linked HA.

show abstract

Prevalence and risk factors of acne scars in patients with acne vulgaris

Cited by 6 publications

References 25 publications

Impact of Lifestyle and Dietary Habits on the Prevalence of Acne Vulgaris: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia

Impact of Lifestyle and Dietary Habits on the Prevalence of Acne Vulgaris: A Cross-Sectional Study From Saudi Arabia

An innovative microcoring technology: A novel approach to acne scar treatment

Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of cross‐linked and non‐cross‐linked hyaluronic acid in combination with botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A double‐blind randomized clinical trial

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About