2004
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and reporting of occupational illness by company size: Population trends and regulatory implications

Abstract: The increased rates of occupational illness in larger businesses reported in the BLS/OSHA survey does not appear to be due to actual incidence or distribution of risk factors, but appears more likely to be due to under-reporting in smaller businesses. Estimates based on the assumption that the ORs based on size are actually similar to the CUSP population survey results suggest that MSD incidence is approximately 3.6-times the reported rates.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be partially explained by larger firms possibly being more proactive and more likely to adopt preventive health safety practices compared to small firms, which may lack work safety experts. 27 In the multivariate analysis model, firm size and geographic location were dependent from measurement year, possibly reflecting the poor homogeneity of reporting in Italy during the study period. Nevertheless, the dependence of exposure levels on a large set of variables calls for caution in the interpretation of the results shown in Tables 1 and 2, and highlights the need for further analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be partially explained by larger firms possibly being more proactive and more likely to adopt preventive health safety practices compared to small firms, which may lack work safety experts. 27 In the multivariate analysis model, firm size and geographic location were dependent from measurement year, possibly reflecting the poor homogeneity of reporting in Italy during the study period. Nevertheless, the dependence of exposure levels on a large set of variables calls for caution in the interpretation of the results shown in Tables 1 and 2, and highlights the need for further analyses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under reporting of MSDs may be pervasive and a general phenomenon in US workplaces [7,[76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. Case counts from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are often much higher than comparable Workers' Comp data [85].…”
Section: Worker's Compensation Is Underutilizedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees in SMEs with less than 20 staff are more often exposed to workplace hazards and suffer more work-related injuries and illnesses than those working in larger enterprises. These observations imply that some of the characteristics of SMEs make it more difficult for them to create and maintain a safe and healthy work environment and to manage safety (Hasle and Limborg, 2006;Mayhew and Peterson, 1999;Morse et al, 2004;Okun et al, 2001;Stevens, 1999;Targoutzidis et al, 2014;Walters, 2006). For example, Sørensen et al (2007) suggest that the workplace, physical and chemical work environments in SMEs are particularly poor compared to larger organizations.…”
Section: Summary Of Current Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%