2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Frailty in Asian Patients With Heart Failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the mFI-v10, we found that 68.3% of older HF patients were frail (47.5% of mild frailty and 20.8% of severe frailty), which were lower to a previous study using the same cumulative deficit approach (83%) 11 but similar to a registry-based study (69%). 21 The high prevalence of frailty may be attributed to the advanced age of our participants (mean age 80.4 years) or the nature of HF. One of our major merits is the nationwide population-based cohort design, which minimized potential selection bias and enabled precise estimation of healthcare utilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using the mFI-v10, we found that 68.3% of older HF patients were frail (47.5% of mild frailty and 20.8% of severe frailty), which were lower to a previous study using the same cumulative deficit approach (83%) 11 but similar to a registry-based study (69%). 21 The high prevalence of frailty may be attributed to the advanced age of our participants (mean age 80.4 years) or the nature of HF. One of our major merits is the nationwide population-based cohort design, which minimized potential selection bias and enabled precise estimation of healthcare utilization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…17,20 Nevertheless, studies using FI to categorize the health risk and to explore the impacts of frailty by FI on the use of HF-related medications and clinical outcomes among older HF adults are very limited. To the best of our knowledge, only one registry-based study focused on symptomatic HF has been reported, 21 and no population-based frailty assessment in Asian HF patients has been published before, not to mention the clinical im-pacts of the interplay between frailty and use of HF-related mediations. The lack of practice guidelines for coexisting frailty and HF results in fluctuating attitudes and suboptimal treatment of HF that hinders its prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk factors were considered based on the following: (1) risk factors for PED identified in previous studies; (2) bedside evaluation completed within 4-6 h after extubation; and (3) variables observed by clinicians or nurses before the onset of dysphagia. Based on these criteria, a total of 35 risk factors were considered, including demographic characteristics (age, gender, body mass index [BMI], smoking history); admission diagnosis and pre-admission complications; surgical data (e.g., operation time, aortic occlusion time, esophageal ultrasound); intubation conditions (e.g., time, model, depth, air pressure, urgent tracheal intubation, repeated intubation); treatment (nasogastric tube, nasogastric tube insertion length, use of sedatives, use of analgesic drugs, pause of sedatives, pause of analgesic drugs); level of consciousness (somnolence); and various evaluations after extubation (e.g., activities of daily living [ADL] score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II [APACHE II] score, Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit [CAM-ICU], New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifi cation, [12] integrity of oral mucosa, voice disorder, sore throat).…”
Section: Risk Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In 2 recent studies of “real-world” as opposed to trial patients, the age gradient related to frailty was small and similar to that observed in our analysis of the DELIVER trial. 3,4…”
Section: In Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In 2 recent studies of "real-world" as opposed to trial patients, the age gradient related to frailty was small and similar to that observed in our analysis of the DELIVER trial. 3,4 We do not agree that trials include few elderly patients. The proportion of patients ≥80 years of age in PARAGON-HF was 22.4%, and in DELIVER, it was 21.4%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%