2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12639-013-0287-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and pathological study of Paramphistomum infection in the small intestine of slaughtered ovine

Abstract: Paramphistomiasis, a trematode infectious disease in ruminants, has been neglected but has recently emerged as an important cause of productivity loss. The small intestine of slaughtered sheep was collected weekly from abattoirs (Kermanshah, Sanandaj, Tabriz and Urmia Slaughterhouses) to monitoring the seasonal occurrence of Paramphistomosis, 2,421 sheep carcasses (743 male (30.69 %) and 1,678 female (69.31 %)) were examined, out of which 0.041 % were positive for Paramphistomum infestation. Furthermore, upon … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
2
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
12
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In cattle farms, the prevalence of 55.9 % seems to be increasing if compared to the survey carried out in the same region by Scala et al (1997a) 18 years ago, where a prevalence of 19.6 % was found; The values found here are in according to the report of Cringoli et al (2012), (55.7 %), while are lower compared to Spanish (61 %) and Uruguayan (69 %) reports as described by Sanchís et al, (2013). The slaughterhouse's survey revealed a very low prevalence of paramphistomosis in sheep (2 %), similar to fi ndings from Iran (0.041 %) (Tehrani et al, 2015) and Turkey (4.43 %) (Ozdal et al, 2010) but was much lower compared to records from Ethiopia (25 %) (Sissay et al, 2007) and India (36.2 %) (Godara et al, 2014). The lower values obtained from sheep coprological analysis and in slaughterhouse's survey could be probably due to the fact that in this species the infection seems to be less frequent than in cattle (Rojo-Vázquez et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In cattle farms, the prevalence of 55.9 % seems to be increasing if compared to the survey carried out in the same region by Scala et al (1997a) 18 years ago, where a prevalence of 19.6 % was found; The values found here are in according to the report of Cringoli et al (2012), (55.7 %), while are lower compared to Spanish (61 %) and Uruguayan (69 %) reports as described by Sanchís et al, (2013). The slaughterhouse's survey revealed a very low prevalence of paramphistomosis in sheep (2 %), similar to fi ndings from Iran (0.041 %) (Tehrani et al, 2015) and Turkey (4.43 %) (Ozdal et al, 2010) but was much lower compared to records from Ethiopia (25 %) (Sissay et al, 2007) and India (36.2 %) (Godara et al, 2014). The lower values obtained from sheep coprological analysis and in slaughterhouse's survey could be probably due to the fact that in this species the infection seems to be less frequent than in cattle (Rojo-Vázquez et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, Yadav et al, (2010) described more cases in summer than rainy season. The highest incidence in sheep in Turkey was reported during autumn followed by summer (Ozdal et al, 2010), however, it was reverse in Iran (Tehrani et al, 2015). Maitra et al (2014) described the difference in species/season/monthly prevalence due to the differences in the agro climatic conditions, availability or abundance of intermediate hosts, animal husbandry/ management practices, length of survey period, sample size and method of sampling.…”
Section: Amphistomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…infection in sheep. Tehrani et al (2015) described three species from sheep carcass as P. cervi, Cotylophoron cotylophorum and G. crumenifer in Iran. Tan et al, (2017) from Malaysia described Paramphistomum spp.…”
Section: Amphistomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The propensity of goats to higher infection rates in young age groups can be attributed to higher susceptibility and lower resistance due to incomplete development of immunity [25]. Higher infection rates in female goats than the males could be attributed to genetic predisposition and differential susceptibility owing to hormonal effects [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%