2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40572-021-00326-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Implications of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Settled Dust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, 18% (17 out of 94) individuals had higher maternal serum concentrations of 4:2 FTSA (C6) than PFHxS (C6). The simultaneous occurrence of PFOS and 6:2 FTSA as well as PFHxS and 4:2 FTSA was reported in paired indoor dust and carpets, 35,36 indicating co-exposure of legacy and emerging PFAS. A previous study also reported that 6:2 FTSA had higher cytotoxicity than PFOS in human liver HL-7702 cell line.…”
Section: Chemicals and Standardsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, 18% (17 out of 94) individuals had higher maternal serum concentrations of 4:2 FTSA (C6) than PFHxS (C6). The simultaneous occurrence of PFOS and 6:2 FTSA as well as PFHxS and 4:2 FTSA was reported in paired indoor dust and carpets, 35,36 indicating co-exposure of legacy and emerging PFAS. A previous study also reported that 6:2 FTSA had higher cytotoxicity than PFOS in human liver HL-7702 cell line.…”
Section: Chemicals and Standardsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, it is the low intentional use of PFASs in food packaging ($2% of the total food packaging) that leads to the largest releases of PFASs, and highlights hotspots/blindspots for the sound management of food packaging. 95,96 These results, specically the low percentage ($2%) of food packaging with intentionally added PFASs, lend support to regulatory initiatives to eliminate the use of PFASs in food packaging in seven U.S. states, 67 the voluntary agreement brokered between the food packaging industry and the U.S. FDA to restrict which PFAS can be used in food packaging, 37 and initiatives among several European countries to restrict nonessential uses of PFAS. [97][98][99] We question whether these initiatives would be able to control ows of PFASs from nonintentional introduction to food packaging in these jurisdictions.…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, it is the low intentional use of PFASs in food packaging (∼2% of the total food packaging) that leads to the largest releases of PFASs, and highlights hotspots/blindspots for the sound management of food packaging. 95,96…”
Section: Implications and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, many of the aforementioned PFAS, as well as polyuoroalkyl phosphoric acid diesters (diPAPs), peruorophosphonates (PFPAs), and peruorophosphinates (PFPIAs), have been measured in indoor dust. 16,17,[28][29][30][31][32] diPAPs have been shown to also be PFAA precursors, as atmospheric photooxidation on mineral dust can transform these compounds to PFCAs. 33 Given the wide variety of PFAS present in the atmosphere, as well as the limitations of offline methods, an online method for PFAS monitoring in gases and aerosols would be highly valuable for better characterization of atmospheric inputs, uxes, transport, and transformations of PFAS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, many of the aforementioned PFAS, as well as polyfluoroalkyl phosphoric acid diesters (diPAPs), perfluorophosphonates (PFPAs), and perfluorophosphinates (PFPIAs), have been measured in indoor dust. 16,17,28–32 diPAPs have been shown to also be PFAA precursors, as atmospheric photooxidation on mineral dust can transform these compounds to PFCAs. 33…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%