Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-011-9807-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and implications of multiple cancer screening needs among Hispanic community health center patients

Abstract: Expanding use of health information technology in community health centers provides an opportunity to create an electronic infrastructure for addressing multiple screening needs from a patient-centered perspective.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two, early detection of lung or liver cancer involves low dose chest computed tomography or abdomen ultrasonography, respectively, which are procedures in Korea only offered (to asymptomatic subjects without particular indications) in commercial private health screening programs, but not in government screening programs that strictly abide to specific screening recommendations [32]. Therefore, mostly health-conscious subjects are exclusively willing to pay the high price for such health packages, a phenomenon not unique in Korea [33]. This would be a source of selection bias not exclusive to our study, but to lung or liver cancer survivors (with more years since diagnosis) in general, that well explains such aforementioned counterintuitive observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two, early detection of lung or liver cancer involves low dose chest computed tomography or abdomen ultrasonography, respectively, which are procedures in Korea only offered (to asymptomatic subjects without particular indications) in commercial private health screening programs, but not in government screening programs that strictly abide to specific screening recommendations [32]. Therefore, mostly health-conscious subjects are exclusively willing to pay the high price for such health packages, a phenomenon not unique in Korea [33]. This would be a source of selection bias not exclusive to our study, but to lung or liver cancer survivors (with more years since diagnosis) in general, that well explains such aforementioned counterintuitive observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Given 0 that cancer screening guidelines present some overlap in age eligibility for cervical, breast and colorectal cancer [8][9][10] it makes sense to integrate the provision of these 3 types of screening to increase participation. [17][18][19] We arbitrarily chose to measure participation 6 weeks before and 3 months after mammogram to ensure the baseline was free of any bias introduced by the recall letters sent a few weeks earlier. The letters included information on cervical and colorectal cancer screening for Screen Test-EACS but not Screen Test clients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design allowed us to examine differences in emergent themes between participants in need of 1 or multiple screenings. All participants were patients of a CHC in a city in northeast Massachusetts that is predominately Latino (>75%) (17) and has high rates of poverty and limited resources (18, 19). Approximately 80% of Latinos living in the city receive care at the CHC; most of the CHC patients are Hispanic (90%) and are of Caribbean origin (ie, Dominican Republic, Puerto Rico) (18).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%