2021
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Factors Associated With Caesarean Delivery in Nepal: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Sample

Abstract: Background Caesarian sections (CS) are life-saving management for a pregnant mother and fetus subject to obstetric complications. The World Health Organization (WHO) expected CS rates not to exceed 10 to 15 per 100 live births in any country. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CS and its associated factors from the 2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS), building on previous studies mentioned in detail in the latter part of the paper. Methods This study analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some of the existing findings seem inconsistent and inconclusive, providing rather contradictory results at least for certain maternal risk factors. Currently, there is substantial evidence that older maternal age, i.e., 35 years or more, considerably increases the rate of caesarean sections and their adverse outcomes [15,30]. In line with the above findings, we found a significantly higher age in women performing caesarean section compared to those delivering vaginally, independently of multiple confounding factors which are also linked with raised probability of caesarean section delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, some of the existing findings seem inconsistent and inconclusive, providing rather contradictory results at least for certain maternal risk factors. Currently, there is substantial evidence that older maternal age, i.e., 35 years or more, considerably increases the rate of caesarean sections and their adverse outcomes [15,30]. In line with the above findings, we found a significantly higher age in women performing caesarean section compared to those delivering vaginally, independently of multiple confounding factors which are also linked with raised probability of caesarean section delivery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In support of this view, prepregnancy maternal obesity has been considered as a significant risk factor for caesarean delivery, even if some studies were characterized by certain limitations [13,14]. Moreover, mothers' age lower than 30 years was shown to decrease the risk of comorbidities related with caesarean section, whereas older maternal age, i.e., 35 years or more, was shown to considerably enhanced the rate of caesarean sections and their adverse outcomes [15]. Several previous studies also indicated that residency, women's education, wealth, and parity may considerably increase caesarean section rates; however, there are also studies which did not confirm these associations [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of CS in this hospital at the time of study was 33.04%, which is higher than that recommended by WHO and the national statistics of Nepal i.e.2016 Nepal Demographic and Health Survey report (NDHS) 5 , 9 . WHO recommends the national CS rate to be between 10 and 15% with less than 10 and greater than 15% representing underuse and overuse of maternal and child health care services, respectively and beyond this recommended level there is no additional reduction in maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity 5 , 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This correlates with the study conducted by Das et al in 2021 (p=0.002). 18 Multiple studies worldwide have also reported similarly that the mothers' age remains a significant factor in determining childbirth through CS. [18][19][20][21][22][23] In contrast, study done in Eastern Ethiopia does not show the association age with Cesarean Section.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But the study conducted by Das et al shows the association of parity (COR = 1.61) and ANC visit (COR=2.50) with Cesarean Section. 18 Non-institutional births were not taken into consideration in determining the extent of normal birth, which is one of the study's weaknesses. This study was conducted at a single center therefore it cannot be applied to all hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%