The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and factors associated with caesarean section in four Hard-to-Reach areas of Bangladesh: Findings from a cross-sectional survey

Abstract: Background Caesarean section (C-section) is a major obstetric life-saving intervention for the prevention of pregnancy and childbirth related complications. Globally C-section is increasing, as well as in Bangladesh. This study identifies the prevalence of C-section and socioeconomic and health care seeking related determinants of C-section among women living in hard-to-reach (HtR) areas in Bangladesh. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire between August and December 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
2
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
21
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is possible for women to have more than one CS in three years, we used the participants' unique identi ers and weighted samples to account for the clustering of CS. The explanatory variables included in the study were identi ed from a review of literature on factors associated with CS use [12,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Supplementary Table 1 operationalises these variables that include residence (urban or rural), maternal age at birth (<20, 20-34 and ≥35 years), education status (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), access to information (Yes or No), marital status (in-a-union and notin-a-union), occupation (not working, agricultural and formal employment), place of delivery (private, public and home/others), antenatal care (ANC) attendance (<4 and ≥4 visits and missing), the weight of the baby (normal, low birth weight and big baby), sex of the baby (male or female), type of pregnancy (singleton or multiple), parity (1, 2-4, ≥5), partner's education (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), and region (East, West, South, North and Kigali City).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it is possible for women to have more than one CS in three years, we used the participants' unique identi ers and weighted samples to account for the clustering of CS. The explanatory variables included in the study were identi ed from a review of literature on factors associated with CS use [12,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Supplementary Table 1 operationalises these variables that include residence (urban or rural), maternal age at birth (<20, 20-34 and ≥35 years), education status (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), access to information (Yes or No), marital status (in-a-union and notin-a-union), occupation (not working, agricultural and formal employment), place of delivery (private, public and home/others), antenatal care (ANC) attendance (<4 and ≥4 visits and missing), the weight of the baby (normal, low birth weight and big baby), sex of the baby (male or female), type of pregnancy (singleton or multiple), parity (1, 2-4, ≥5), partner's education (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), and region (East, West, South, North and Kigali City).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of caesarean section was varied across different countries. For instance, studies done in Latin American and Caribbean regions 40.5 % [ 2 ], United states 32 % [ 7 ], South Africa 42.4 % [ 8 ], South India 32.6 % [ 9 ], Tanzania 27 % [ 10 ], Sri Lanka 25.13 % [ 11 ], United Arab Emirates 30.2 % [ 12 ], Bangladesh 13 % [ 13 ], and in Ethiopia between 20.2 and 38.3 % of mothers were undergone caesarean section [ 14 – 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly cited factors of performing caesarean section were antepartum haemorrhage, fetal macrosomia, previous history of caesarean section, urban residence, and abnormal presentation were reported [ 13 , 15 19 ]. Failed induction of labour, non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern, and failure of labour progress were reported indications of performing caesarean section [ 8 , 15 , 18 , 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this observation, and the fact that no ICD firings have been described during delivery in the literature, it is recommended that antitachycardia function remains on during vaginal deliveries as well as during cesarean sections (C-sections) as long as the cautery is not involved [ 18 ]. According to a prevalence of 13% of C-sections in the general population, operative delivery seems more common in the evaluated studies of pregnant women with an ICD [ 55 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%