Abstract:Background Caesarean section (C-section) is a major obstetric life-saving intervention for the prevention of pregnancy and childbirth related complications. Globally C-section is increasing, as well as in Bangladesh. This study identifies the prevalence of C-section and socioeconomic and health care seeking related determinants of C-section among women living in hard-to-reach (HtR) areas in Bangladesh. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire between August and December 2… Show more
“…Since it is possible for women to have more than one CS in three years, we used the participants' unique identi ers and weighted samples to account for the clustering of CS. The explanatory variables included in the study were identi ed from a review of literature on factors associated with CS use [12,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Supplementary Table 1 operationalises these variables that include residence (urban or rural), maternal age at birth (<20, 20-34 and ≥35 years), education status (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), access to information (Yes or No), marital status (in-a-union and notin-a-union), occupation (not working, agricultural and formal employment), place of delivery (private, public and home/others), antenatal care (ANC) attendance (<4 and ≥4 visits and missing), the weight of the baby (normal, low birth weight and big baby), sex of the baby (male or female), type of pregnancy (singleton or multiple), parity (1, 2-4, ≥5), partner's education (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), and region (East, West, South, North and Kigali City).…”
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is an important medical intervention for reducing the risk of poor perinatal outcomes. However, CS trends in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continue to increase yet maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity remain high. Rwanda, like many other countries in SSA, has shown an increasing trend in the use of CS. This study assessed the trends and factors associated with CS delivery in Rwanda over the past two decades.Methods: We used nationally representative child datasets from the Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2000 to 2019-20. All births in the preceding three years to the survey were assessed for the mode of delivery. The participants’ characteristics, trends and the prevalence of CS were analysed using frequencies and percentages. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess the factors associated with population and hospital-based CS in Rwanda for each of the surveys.Results: The population-based rate of CS in Rwanda significantly increased from 2.2% (95% CI 1.8–2.6) in 2000 to 15.6% (95% CI 13.9–16.5) in 2019-20. Despite increasing in all health facilities over time, there was an almost four-fold difference in the rate of CS between private (60.6%) and public health facilities (15.4%) in 2019-20. The rates and odds of CS were disproportionately high among women of high socioeconomic groups, those who resided in Kigali city, had multiple pregnancies, and attended at least four antenatal care visits while the odds of CS were significantly lower among multiparous women and those who had female babies. Conclusion: Over the past two decades, the rate of CS use in Rwanda increased significantly at health facility and population level with high regional and socio-economic disparities. There is a need to examine the disparities in CS trends and developing tailored policy guidelines to ensure proper use of CS in Rwanda.
“…Since it is possible for women to have more than one CS in three years, we used the participants' unique identi ers and weighted samples to account for the clustering of CS. The explanatory variables included in the study were identi ed from a review of literature on factors associated with CS use [12,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Supplementary Table 1 operationalises these variables that include residence (urban or rural), maternal age at birth (<20, 20-34 and ≥35 years), education status (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), access to information (Yes or No), marital status (in-a-union and notin-a-union), occupation (not working, agricultural and formal employment), place of delivery (private, public and home/others), antenatal care (ANC) attendance (<4 and ≥4 visits and missing), the weight of the baby (normal, low birth weight and big baby), sex of the baby (male or female), type of pregnancy (singleton or multiple), parity (1, 2-4, ≥5), partner's education (no formal, primary and secondary or higher), and region (East, West, South, North and Kigali City).…”
Background: Caesarean section (CS) is an important medical intervention for reducing the risk of poor perinatal outcomes. However, CS trends in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continue to increase yet maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity remain high. Rwanda, like many other countries in SSA, has shown an increasing trend in the use of CS. This study assessed the trends and factors associated with CS delivery in Rwanda over the past two decades.Methods: We used nationally representative child datasets from the Rwanda Demographic and Health Survey 2000 to 2019-20. All births in the preceding three years to the survey were assessed for the mode of delivery. The participants’ characteristics, trends and the prevalence of CS were analysed using frequencies and percentages. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were used to assess the factors associated with population and hospital-based CS in Rwanda for each of the surveys.Results: The population-based rate of CS in Rwanda significantly increased from 2.2% (95% CI 1.8–2.6) in 2000 to 15.6% (95% CI 13.9–16.5) in 2019-20. Despite increasing in all health facilities over time, there was an almost four-fold difference in the rate of CS between private (60.6%) and public health facilities (15.4%) in 2019-20. The rates and odds of CS were disproportionately high among women of high socioeconomic groups, those who resided in Kigali city, had multiple pregnancies, and attended at least four antenatal care visits while the odds of CS were significantly lower among multiparous women and those who had female babies. Conclusion: Over the past two decades, the rate of CS use in Rwanda increased significantly at health facility and population level with high regional and socio-economic disparities. There is a need to examine the disparities in CS trends and developing tailored policy guidelines to ensure proper use of CS in Rwanda.
“…The magnitude of caesarean section was varied across different countries. For instance, studies done in Latin American and Caribbean regions 40.5 % [ 2 ], United states 32 % [ 7 ], South Africa 42.4 % [ 8 ], South India 32.6 % [ 9 ], Tanzania 27 % [ 10 ], Sri Lanka 25.13 % [ 11 ], United Arab Emirates 30.2 % [ 12 ], Bangladesh 13 % [ 13 ], and in Ethiopia between 20.2 and 38.3 % of mothers were undergone caesarean section [ 14 – 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly cited factors of performing caesarean section were antepartum haemorrhage, fetal macrosomia, previous history of caesarean section, urban residence, and abnormal presentation were reported [ 13 , 15 – 19 ]. Failed induction of labour, non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern, and failure of labour progress were reported indications of performing caesarean section [ 8 , 15 , 18 , 21 ].…”
Background
Caesarean section is a life-saving comprehensive obstetric procedure of women and newborn performed during childbirth-related complications and should be universally accessible for all pregnant mothers globally. Appropriate use of caesarean section can reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. However, inappropriate use of caesarean section can negatively affect infant health, women health, and future pregnancies. The magnitude and factors associated with caesarean section delivery were not consistent and will vary between different hospitals of Ethiopia. Hence, this study aimed at assessing the magnitude and factors associated with caesarean section deliveries in Southwest Ethiopia.
Methods and Materials
An institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted from January 1 to February 29, 2020. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select 551 study participants. A pretested, structured, and face-to-face interview was used to collect data. Data were entered into Epi-data version 4.2.0 and exported to SPSS version 23 for analysis. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with caesarean section deliveries. P values < 0.05 result were considered as a statistically significant association.
Results
The magnitude of caesarean section deliveries was found to be 32.5 % (95 % CI; 28.6%-36.7 %). Mothers resided in an urban area [AOR = 2.58, (95% CI; 1.66–4.01)], multiple pregnancies [AOR = 3.15, (95% CI; 1.89–5.23), malpresentation [AOR = 3.05, (95% CI; 1.77–5.24)], and previous history of caesarean section [AOR = 3.55, (95% CI; 2.23–5.64) were factors associated with caesarean section deliveries.
Conclusions
Caesarean section deliveries were found high in the study area. Mothers resided in an urban area, multiple pregnancies, malpresentation, and previous history of caesarean section were factors associated with caesarean section deliveries. Therefore, counselling of mothers on the risk of giving birth through elective caesarean section without absolute and relative medical indications and giving enough time for the trial of vaginal birth after caesarean section are recommended.
“…Based on this observation, and the fact that no ICD firings have been described during delivery in the literature, it is recommended that antitachycardia function remains on during vaginal deliveries as well as during cesarean sections (C-sections) as long as the cautery is not involved [ 18 ]. According to a prevalence of 13% of C-sections in the general population, operative delivery seems more common in the evaluated studies of pregnant women with an ICD [ 55 ].…”
Background: With the advent of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) technology in recent decades, patients with inherited or congenital cardiomyopathy have a greater chance of survival into adulthood. Women with ICDs in this group are now more likely to reach reproductive age. However, pregnancy represents a challenge for clinicians, as no guidelines for the treatment of pregnant women with an ICD are currently available. Methods: To analyze this issue, we performed a systematic screening of the literature using the keywords: pregnancy with ICD, lead fracture in pregnancy, lead thrombi in pregnancy, ventricular tachycardia in pregnancy, inappropriate shocks in pregnancy, ICD discharge in pregnancy and ICD shock in pregnancy. Of 1101 publications found, 27 publications were eligible for further analysis (four retrospective trials and 23 case reports). Results: According to physiological changes in pregnancy, resulting in an increase in heart rate and cardiac output, a vulnerability for malignant arrhythmias and device-related complications in ICD carriers might be suspected. While the literature is limited on this issue, maternal complications including arrhythmia burden with following ICD therapies, thromboembolic events and lead complications as well as inappropriate shock therapy have been reported. According to the limited available studies, associated risk seems not to be more frequent than in the general population and depends on the underlying cardiac pathology. Furthermore, worsening of heart failure and related cardiovascular disease have been reported with associated risk of preterm delivery. These observations are exaggerated by restricted applications of diagnostics and treatment due to the risk of fetal harm in this population. Conclusions: Due to limited data on management of ICDs during pregnancy, further scientific investigations are required. Consequently, careful risk assessment with individual risk evaluation and close follow ups with interdisciplinary treatment are recommended in pregnant ICD carriers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.