2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Estimated Economic Burden of Substandard and Falsified Medicines in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Abstract: Key Points Question What are the prevalence and estimated economic burden of substandard and falsified medicines in low- and middle-income countries? Findings In this systematic review of 265 studies comprising 400 647 drug samples and meta-analysis of 96 studies comprising 67 839 drug samples, the prevalence of substandard and falsified medicines in low- and middle-income countries was 13.6% overall (19.1% for antimalarials and 12.4% for antibiotics). Data… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
241
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
9
241
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many SSA countries are faced with the challenges of limited financial resources for medicine safety surveillance, inadequate technology, insufficient infrastructure and a lack of HCPs trained in PV. Challenges associated with traditional healing practices [16], the relatively low literacy level among adults, widespread self-medication and counterfeit drugs could also have an impact on AE reporting [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many SSA countries are faced with the challenges of limited financial resources for medicine safety surveillance, inadequate technology, insufficient infrastructure and a lack of HCPs trained in PV. Challenges associated with traditional healing practices [16], the relatively low literacy level among adults, widespread self-medication and counterfeit drugs could also have an impact on AE reporting [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, most of the burden falls on low‐ and middle‐income countries, such as Lebanon, because of poor pharmaceutical governance, weak technical capacity and poor supply chain management . Circulation of substandard and falsified medicines with little clinical effectiveness also places entire communities at risk of drug resistance, posing a threat to global treatment effectiveness, as well as undermining people's overall trust in the health system and its legitimate healthcare professionals . Solving the problem of substandard medications is important to ensure that patients do not lose faith in the benefits of pharmaceuticals and become non‐adherent with their treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the fact that the failure rate was only 2%, it cannot be ignored because presence of substandard drugs in the market at any percentage poses threats to society. These threats are as follows but not limited to drug toxicity, poor treatment outcomes and disease prognosis, drug resistance and death but also in terms of economic implications and effects on global pandemics [43].…”
Section: Laboratory Tier II Confirmatory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be explained by the fact that most of ARVs in the market are procured by government agencies with donor funding. The funding agencies impose stringent procurement condition such as requirements for the WHO pre-qualification for all suppliers and so, low failure rates [43]. Of importance is that for all sampled medicines that were deemed to have deficiencies during PIR, the TMDA directed manufacturers to bring requests for amendments for all deficiencies observed.…”
Section: Laboratory Tier II Confirmatory Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%