2007
DOI: 10.4314/kenvet.v27i1.39574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Economic Importance of Fascioliasis in Cattle, Sheep and Goats in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prevalence of fascioliasis is not uncommon in the country particularly in the province of Balochistan where sheep rearing is the biggest economic resource of rural population (Nawaz and Nawaz,1987). Economic losses in sheep and cattle has also been recorded by (Njeruh, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of fascioliasis is not uncommon in the country particularly in the province of Balochistan where sheep rearing is the biggest economic resource of rural population (Nawaz and Nawaz,1987). Economic losses in sheep and cattle has also been recorded by (Njeruh, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corresponding with the numerous studies from various countries, reviewed studies further showed that the infection rate was significantly higher in young animals than in old animals (73)(74)(75). However, only one study compared prevalence in males and female in cattle that showed highprevalence of fasciolosis in males than females in the lowthroughput abattoirs (LTPAs) which corresponded with reports from other studies (21,74,(76)(77)(78), but the HTPA reported high infections in the females (36). Animals with poor body conditions scores showed to be more susceptible to infection (21,74,79,80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“… Sex Both males and females seem to be equally likely to have fasciolosis. Studies showed that Fasciola infection due to either F. gigantica or F. hepatica was more prevalent in males (Kithuka et al ., 2002; Njeruh et al ., 2004; Kedir et al ., 2012; Munyeme et al , 2010; Betebo, 2017); however, the difference was not significant, with the exception to that reported by Kedir et al . (2012) in small ruminants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%