2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Distribution of Ossified Lesions in the Whole Spine of Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament A Multicenter Study (JOSL CT study)

Abstract: Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) can cause severe and irreversible paralysis in not only the cervical spine but also the thoracolumbar spine. To date, however, the prevalence and distribution of OPLL in the whole spine has not been precisely evaluated in patients with cervical OPLL. Therefore, we conducted a multi-center study to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence and distribution of OPLL using multi-detector computed tomography (CT) images in the whole spine and to analyze what … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
61
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
61
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the OS-indexes for OPLL and OSIL were represented as the OP-index and OSI-index, respectively. We subdivided the patients into three subgroups according to the cervical OP-index, which is consistent with a previous report [14]: Grade 1: patients with a cervical OP-index of 5 or less; Grade 2: patients with a cervical OP-index of 6–9; and Grade 3: patients with a cervical OP-index of 10 or more. The presence of ONL was also evaluated.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Therefore, the OS-indexes for OPLL and OSIL were represented as the OP-index and OSI-index, respectively. We subdivided the patients into three subgroups according to the cervical OP-index, which is consistent with a previous report [14]: Grade 1: patients with a cervical OP-index of 5 or less; Grade 2: patients with a cervical OP-index of 6–9; and Grade 3: patients with a cervical OP-index of 10 or more. The presence of ONL was also evaluated.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A retrospective multicenter study that included patients with cervical OPLL reported that OPLL was also present in the thoracolumbar spine in 17.8% of cases and in the lumbar spine in 12.1% 20 . Furthermore, it has been documented that the prevalence of OPLL in the thoracolumbar spine increases with the number of cervical levels affected by OPLL 1,2 . Similarly, patients with CS often have low back pain as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers have investigated several issues related to ossification, including prevalence [1][2][3] , distribution of the ossified lesions [1][2][3][4][5][6] , and neurologic outcomes after surgical treatment [7][8][9][10] , there has been no study documenting in detail the subjective symptoms and self-reported ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with OPLL. The aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between severity of pain and neurologic status in patients with OPLL and to identify whether there are any specific clinical symptoms in patients with cervical OPLL that are not present in those with cervical spondylosis (CS), which often leads to myelopathy similar to that occurring in cervical OPLL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we categorized patients with cervical OPLL into three groups according to the number of segments at which cervical OPLL could be confirmed. In a previous study [ 6 ], we demonstrated that this classification could predict not only the presence but also the degree of hyperostosis in the whole spine. Therefore, we investigated whether there was a correlation between this classification system and the prevalence of ossified lesions at each segment in the thoracolumbar spine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We also defined the sum of the levels at which OPLL was present in the cervical spine as the cervical OP index. Using a previously reported method [ 6 ], we divided patients into three groups according to their cervical OP index values, namely, grade 1 (≤5), grade 2 (6–9), and grade 3 (≥10). The physical and radiologic data were compared between the male and female patient populations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%