Abstract:We examine two studies on the prevalence and comorbidity of anxiety and depressive disorders in Japanese patients in primary care settings. The PRIME-MD study (Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders) in Japan was conducted in seven primary care sites. The sample group included 601 adult patients (249 males, 352 females, mean age = 58.9 years, SD = 16.5). Of the 12.5% of patients diagnosed with mood disorders, 5.0% (n = 29) were major depressive disorder, and 6.7% (n = 40) were minor depressive disorder. T… Show more
“…In terms of the overall prevalence of depressive disorders in PHC, our finding (15.8%) was higher than those of Jo et al from Korea (14.1%), 10 Muramatsu et al from Japan (12.5%), 24 Rancans et al from Latvia (10.2%) 23 and Sung et al from Singapore (9%). 22 The differences could be explained by using different diagnostic criteria, such as in our study and one by Jo et al that used DSM-5 criteria for diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In terms of the overall prevalence of depressive disorders in PHC, our finding (15.8%) was higher than those of Jo et al from Korea (14.1%), 10 Muramatsu et al from Japan (12.5%), 24 Rancans et al from Latvia (10.2%) 23 The differences could be explained by using different diagnostic criteria, such as in our study and one by Jo et al that used DSM-5 criteria for diagnosis. 10 In contrast, the other studies chose the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) 22,23 and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…10 In contrast, the other studies chose the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) 22,23 and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) criteria. 24 The prevalence of MDD at 8% in our study was higher than in other previous studies by Jo et al…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…(5.4%), 10 Muramatsu et al (5%), 24 and Sung et al (5%), 22 while that of other subtypes was nearly the same, including dysthymia (approximately 1%), 10,24 and depressive disorders not otherwise specified (around 7%). 22,24,25 Our study discovered a higher overall prevalence of depressive disorders than previous studies using the gold standard criteria, which the recruiting time frame could explain during the COVID-19 pandemic when Ho Chi Minh City had recently reopened following a three-month lockdown due to the fourth COVID-19 wave. 26 This is consistent with a survey conducted in Vietnam by Duong et al to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which discovered that 23.5% of participants experienced depression during the first nationwide lockdown.…”
Objective This research was conducted to identify the prevalence and associated factors of depressive disorders, as well as evaluate the recognition rate of general practitioners in detecting these mental health issues in primary care. Method Five hundred and twelve participants (55.3% female, mean age = 46.35 years) were assessed by psychiatrists based on the DSM-5 clinical procedures over a two-month survey in a primary care facility in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Results There were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9-19.2) of the population having depressive disorders, with major depressive disorder being the most prevalent subtype at 8% (95% CI 5.9-10.6). General practitioners could detect depressive disorders in 2.5% of all cases (95% CI .5-7.7). Significantly linked with depressive disorders in multivariable analysis were Chinese ethnic or other minority races (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 4.10, 95% CI 1.04-16.12), and low economic status (aOR = 5.41, 95% CI 1.29-22.59). Conclusions The high prevalence of depressive disorders in outpatients of primary care clinics may raise the awareness of the practitioners about screening and other appropriate actions to tackle the issue.
“…In terms of the overall prevalence of depressive disorders in PHC, our finding (15.8%) was higher than those of Jo et al from Korea (14.1%), 10 Muramatsu et al from Japan (12.5%), 24 Rancans et al from Latvia (10.2%) 23 and Sung et al from Singapore (9%). 22 The differences could be explained by using different diagnostic criteria, such as in our study and one by Jo et al that used DSM-5 criteria for diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…In terms of the overall prevalence of depressive disorders in PHC, our finding (15.8%) was higher than those of Jo et al from Korea (14.1%), 10 Muramatsu et al from Japan (12.5%), 24 Rancans et al from Latvia (10.2%) 23 The differences could be explained by using different diagnostic criteria, such as in our study and one by Jo et al that used DSM-5 criteria for diagnosis. 10 In contrast, the other studies chose the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) 22,23 and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) criteria.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…10 In contrast, the other studies chose the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I) 22,23 and the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) criteria. 24 The prevalence of MDD at 8% in our study was higher than in other previous studies by Jo et al…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…(5.4%), 10 Muramatsu et al (5%), 24 and Sung et al (5%), 22 while that of other subtypes was nearly the same, including dysthymia (approximately 1%), 10,24 and depressive disorders not otherwise specified (around 7%). 22,24,25 Our study discovered a higher overall prevalence of depressive disorders than previous studies using the gold standard criteria, which the recruiting time frame could explain during the COVID-19 pandemic when Ho Chi Minh City had recently reopened following a three-month lockdown due to the fourth COVID-19 wave. 26 This is consistent with a survey conducted in Vietnam by Duong et al to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which discovered that 23.5% of participants experienced depression during the first nationwide lockdown.…”
Objective This research was conducted to identify the prevalence and associated factors of depressive disorders, as well as evaluate the recognition rate of general practitioners in detecting these mental health issues in primary care. Method Five hundred and twelve participants (55.3% female, mean age = 46.35 years) were assessed by psychiatrists based on the DSM-5 clinical procedures over a two-month survey in a primary care facility in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Results There were 15.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.9-19.2) of the population having depressive disorders, with major depressive disorder being the most prevalent subtype at 8% (95% CI 5.9-10.6). General practitioners could detect depressive disorders in 2.5% of all cases (95% CI .5-7.7). Significantly linked with depressive disorders in multivariable analysis were Chinese ethnic or other minority races (adjusted odds ratios [aOR] = 4.10, 95% CI 1.04-16.12), and low economic status (aOR = 5.41, 95% CI 1.29-22.59). Conclusions The high prevalence of depressive disorders in outpatients of primary care clinics may raise the awareness of the practitioners about screening and other appropriate actions to tackle the issue.
“…Our findings backed up and elaborated on the link between obesity and the onset of depression, particularly among women with the assistance of depression severity through PHQ9. The primary care assessment of mental disorders (PRIME-MD) is a great approach developed a decade ago to help primary care doctors make criteria-based diagnoses of five types of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV disorders that are typically seen in medical patients: mood, anxiety, somatoform, alcohol, and eating disorders [ 15 ]. The PHQ is a three-page self-managed and administered variant of the PRIME-MD that has been thoroughly validated in two large studies that comprised 3,000 patients in eight primary care clinics and 3,000 patients in research settings [ 16 ].…”
Introduction: The prevalence of depression is increasing day by day, which predisposes individuals toward significant functional impairment, and increases the risk of suicide and comorbid physical health problems. Body mass index (BMI) and depression are supposed to be associated with each other; however, the effects of depression on body image have not been identified from the perspective of socioeconomic status, which has been considered a major risk factor for the development of depression. Hence, the study was designed to evaluate the prevalence of depression among adults in government schools and to analyze its association with BMI among different socioeconomic statuses.
Methodology: It was a cross-sectional study conducted at two government schools in Shah Faisal colony from September to October 2019. The study participants were girls of age between 11 and 18 years belonging to different socioeconomic statuses, i.e. low, middle, and high. The calculated sample size was 550 which was calculated at 50% proportion of the total population. A self-developed proforma was administered for collecting demographic data, and students’ weight and height were noted for calculating BMI. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) 9 modified depression scale was used to assess the depression among study participants. The chi-square test was applied to check the association between BMI and depression score. The study was approved by the IRB of CPSP Karachi and the reference code ME/HCSM/2019/TWC/G-054 was allotted.
Results: There were 345 (62.7%) participants of age 13-15 years, and most of the participants belonged to middle socioeconomic status, 413 (75%). BMI calculation of study participants showed that 417 (75.8%) scored as underweight and 131 (23.8%) had a normal index. According to the PHQ9 scale, 381 (69.3%) participants were having mild depression and 60 (10.9%) had moderate depression. BMI and depression were not associated significantly with a p-value =0.135.
Conclusion: The BMI score of study participants seemed to be underweight or normal. The study could not rule out the association of BMI with depression. However, according to the PHQ9 scale score, many participants screened as sufferers of mild to moderate depression, which is alarming, as depression at the age of 11-18 years may predispose young girls to chronic disease and other psychological conditions.
Anxiety becomes one of the most common disorders in the world and the early adulthood phase becomes anxiety-prone because of all the demands and stressful conditions. In addition, anxiety also involves complex biological, psychological, and socio-cultural phenomena. This cross-sectional study examined the role of emotion regulation, family function, and sex differences in early adulthood anxiety. The study used convenience sampling technique and involved 222 participants (20.27% of male and 79.73% of female) aged between 18 to 30 years (M=24.9, SD=3) were assessed with State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), and Family Assessment Device (FAD). Data analysis used ANCOVA and multiple regression. The results suggest that emotion regulation, family functioning, and sex differences simultaneously play a significant role in anxiety (p=0.000). Emotion regulation, family function, as well as sex differences, partially indicated a significant role in anxiety (p=0.018, p=0.000, p=0.008). Therefore, enhancing emotion regulation ability and strengthening family function can be one way to prevent or minimize the likelihood of anxiety.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.