2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Characteristics of Root Resorption Identified in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also likely underdiagnosed in posterior teeth due to overlap of roots and greater difficulty in achieving ideal angulation to assess all the roots (especially for maxillary molars due to bucco‐lingual divergence of the roots). This may account for the higher prevalence of root resorption in posterior teeth reported as an incidental finding on CBCT compared with anterior teeth 92 . However, the findings of this study may be biased as the decision to take a CBCT scan was understandably not randomised for ethical reasons.…”
Section: Levels 2 and 3: Diagnostic Accuracy/thinking Efficacymentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also likely underdiagnosed in posterior teeth due to overlap of roots and greater difficulty in achieving ideal angulation to assess all the roots (especially for maxillary molars due to bucco‐lingual divergence of the roots). This may account for the higher prevalence of root resorption in posterior teeth reported as an incidental finding on CBCT compared with anterior teeth 92 . However, the findings of this study may be biased as the decision to take a CBCT scan was understandably not randomised for ethical reasons.…”
Section: Levels 2 and 3: Diagnostic Accuracy/thinking Efficacymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This may account for the higher prevalence of root resorption in posterior teeth reported as an incidental finding on CBCT compared with anterior teeth. 92 However, the findings of this study may be biased as the decision to take a CBCT scan was understandably not randomised for ethical reasons. CBCT scans may be a valuable adjunct when root resorption is suspected based on the history and clinical findings, or where it has been confirmed to be present on conventional radiographs but the extent is unclear.…”
Section: Detection Of Root Resorptionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…IRR finding is very unusual in clinical practice since they are typically asymptomatic and their finding is ascribed to serendipity during standard radiographic examinations. According to Dao et al .,[ 12 ] the prevalence of internal resorption was the highest for anterior teeth (15.6%), almost four times greater prevalence for molars (4%) and almost two times greater prevalence than for premolars (8.3%). Furthermore, the most prevalent resorption types were external (29.3%), cervical (22.5%), infection-induced apical resorption (13.7%), internal (9.6%), and impacted tooth induced (8.8%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dao y col. (2023), concluyen también que la CBCT, entrega localización y extensión precisa de la reabsorción radicular, aportando valiosa información acerca del diagnóstico, pronóstico, plan de tratamiento y seguimiento, tanto en casos simples como complejos de reabsorciones radiculares externas (6) .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified