2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.0597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Causes of Visual Loss Among the Indigenous Peoples of the World

Abstract: IMPORTANCEStudies have documented a higher disease burden in indigenous compared with nonindigenous populations, but no global data on the epidemiology of visual loss in indigenous peoples are available. A systematic review of literature on visual loss in the world's indigenous populations could identify major gaps and inform interventions to reduce their burden of visual loss.OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review on the prevalence and causes of visual loss among the world's indigenous populations.EVIDENCE … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Another study found a lack of knowledge and willingness among 3 rd year medical students. 25 Overall, our study participant demonstrated a decreased level of knowledge in many areas in comparison to other international studies as our participants had a much lower percentage of correctly answered questions relative to many international studies. 19,25 Data from our study shows that relying only on media to increase the knowledge of eye donation among medical students is not enough.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…24 Another study found a lack of knowledge and willingness among 3 rd year medical students. 25 Overall, our study participant demonstrated a decreased level of knowledge in many areas in comparison to other international studies as our participants had a much lower percentage of correctly answered questions relative to many international studies. 19,25 Data from our study shows that relying only on media to increase the knowledge of eye donation among medical students is not enough.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…25 Overall, our study participant demonstrated a decreased level of knowledge in many areas in comparison to other international studies as our participants had a much lower percentage of correctly answered questions relative to many international studies. 19,25 Data from our study shows that relying only on media to increase the knowledge of eye donation among medical students is not enough. Therefore, employing different curative and preventative features of corneal blindness with basic eye health care in the curriculum is greatly needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The earliest reports from 1996, albeit from a specific region of Australia, found that 20.9% of the population had any DR. By comparison, the most recent national level estimates were 39.4% in 2017 among Indigenous Australians over the age of 40 [14][15][16]. Furthermore, the prevalence of diabetes-related vision impairment, although varying widely between 5.2% to as high as 26.5% depending on the study context, sampling methodology and region, is consistently reported to be higher among Indigenous Australians [14][15][16]. Among non-Indigenous Australians, diabetic complications contribute only 1.7% of the total burden of vision impairment and these rates have remained largely unchanged over a twenty-year timespan [12,17].…”
Section: Diabetic Retinopathy Among Indigenous Australiansmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Decades on, our recent report from Australia's National Eye Health Survey (NEHS) found that refractive error remains the leading cause of visual impairment among Indigenous and non‐Indigenous Australian adults, accounting for 63.5% and 61.7% of cases, respectively . In the present study, we aim to undertake further analysis to elucidate prevalence and factors associated with severe uncorrected refractive error (≄2 lines improvement in subjects with a presenting vision <6/12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%