2011
DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.596254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and Calcification of Intracranial Arterial Stenotic Lesions as Assessed With Multidetector Computed Tomography Angiography

Abstract: Background and Purpose-Intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) in patients with recent ischemic stroke is associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke. More insight into the pathophysiology of ICAS could help identify patients at high risk requiring more aggressive secondary prevention. We evaluated the prevalence, distribution, calcification, and the risk factors predisposing ICAS in a European stroke population. Methods-Consecutive patients with a transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke (nϭ786) were ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, mild (\50 %) intracranial atherosclerosis could determine a stroke just as in mild carotid disease, and this type of patients are currently excluded by most studies, including ours. Using a lower threshold (C30 %) for detection of ICAS, a higher prevalence (up to 17.8 %) was documented [8,35]. Noteworthy, most of the above-mentioned limitations of the ISIDE study could actually be interpreted as strengths, since they could only give rise to an underestimation of the prevalence of ICAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, mild (\50 %) intracranial atherosclerosis could determine a stroke just as in mild carotid disease, and this type of patients are currently excluded by most studies, including ours. Using a lower threshold (C30 %) for detection of ICAS, a higher prevalence (up to 17.8 %) was documented [8,35]. Noteworthy, most of the above-mentioned limitations of the ISIDE study could actually be interpreted as strengths, since they could only give rise to an underestimation of the prevalence of ICAS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30, 42 The calcifications that were detected showed low values in all quantitative maps. The PD map showed the largest differences between calcifications and other plaque components and the intracranial vessel wall.…”
Section: 41mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…La región más afectada fue el sifón carotídeo y luego el segmento vertebral V4, mientras que las arterias cerebrales mostraron un compromiso escaso. No obstante, otros autores encontraron una mayor incidencia en el territorio vertebrobasilar o posterior, con afectación del segmento V4 y el tronco basilar en un 40-48% y de las arterias carótidas internas intracraneales en un 25-30% (siendo el sifón carotídeo el más afectado) 7,8 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified