2011
DOI: 10.2478/v10181-011-0070-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter in raw milk in the selected areas of Poland

Abstract: During the recent years, an immense increase in the number of food poisoning cases in people caused by Campylobacter (C.) species has occurred. Raw milk, next to poultry meat, is considered the most frequent cause of food poisoning in people caused by the subject bacteria, although it is not always possible to isolate Campylobacter cells from the incriminated milk. Most probably this difficulty is caused by low concentration of the pathogen in milk at the level of 2/3 cells/ml although even such low concentrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
16
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…39,40,60,89 In this study, 38 out of 284 (13.4%) of all milk samples were positive for Campylobacter spp., which corroborates findings reported in some countries, including Pakistan and Italy. 9,35,41 However, the prevalence of Campylobacter in milk in this study was higher in comparison with samples from Nigeria, Iran, Egypt, and Poland 27,69,73,94 and lower than that reported in China. 96 Therefore, the prevalence of Campylobacter in milk appears to vary between different countries.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…39,40,60,89 In this study, 38 out of 284 (13.4%) of all milk samples were positive for Campylobacter spp., which corroborates findings reported in some countries, including Pakistan and Italy. 9,35,41 However, the prevalence of Campylobacter in milk in this study was higher in comparison with samples from Nigeria, Iran, Egypt, and Poland 27,69,73,94 and lower than that reported in China. 96 Therefore, the prevalence of Campylobacter in milk appears to vary between different countries.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…38,92 In addition, a Campylobacter prevalence of 41.7%, 10.2%, and 4.6% had been previously reported in raw bulk tank milk in Northern Italy, Pakistan, and Poland, respectively, while 6.25% of raw cow milk samples from retail stores were contaminated with Campylobacter in Iran. 9,41,69,94 Milk can be considered a re-emerging risk factor, because the consumption of unpasteurized raw milk and/or products made from raw milk is becoming more popular in most countries. 5,77 Taken together, these observations pose a particular concern for countries where milk is consumed raw on a regular basis or where no effort exists for prevention and control of carcass contamination.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is in agreement with previous studies performed in Italy on raw milk sold for direct consumption, which ranged between 0 and 2.2% in different regions (Giacometti et al , 2012, 2013). The observed prevalence is also in agreement with other investigations performed in different countries (Desmasures et al , 1997; Dontorou et al , 2003; Meyer-Broseta et al , 2003; Oliver et al , 2005, 2009; Wysok et al , 2011). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Of seven isolates tested, five (71.5 %) were resistant to doxycycline and six (85.8 %) to tetracyclines and ciprofloxacin (Wysok et al, 2011). In Italy, in a study in 2012 (Serraino et al, 2013), the presence of Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Dairy Cattlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For EU countries, in a study in 2010 on the occurrence of Campylobacter bacteria in 150 bulk milk samples of bovine origin tested from selected regions of Poland, C. jejuni was isolated from seven (4.6 %) samples. Of seven isolates tested, five (71.5 %) were resistant to doxycycline and six (85.8 %) to tetracyclines and ciprofloxacin (Wysok et al, 2011). In Italy, in a study in 2012 (Serraino et al, 2013), the presence of Campylobacter spp.…”
Section: Dairy Cattlementioning
confidence: 98%