Biofuels 2011
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-385099-7.00007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment Technologies for Lignocellulose-to-Bioethanol Conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
1
60
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Furfural (1 g/L) and 5-HMF (0.1 g/L), coming from sugar degradation, were also present in lower concentration. These results are in accordance to previous works that shown similar inhibitors composition and content in steam-exploded wheat straw prehydrolysates [2,18].…”
Section: Experimental Designsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Furfural (1 g/L) and 5-HMF (0.1 g/L), coming from sugar degradation, were also present in lower concentration. These results are in accordance to previous works that shown similar inhibitors composition and content in steam-exploded wheat straw prehydrolysates [2,18].…”
Section: Experimental Designsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…From both figures it can be seen that the type of soaking pretreatment is more effective to decrease the crude fiber content in solid sago waste followed by heating pretreatment and without pretreatment. Choosing the right pretreatment method is very important because it determines which hydrolysis and fermentation methods will be used later [19]. The uses of strong base solution in this study aims to make the solid sago waste can undergo a delignification process before going into the fermentation process.…”
Section: Results Analysis Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The corn was ground using a Fitz Mill (Model DAS 06, Fitzpatrick Co., Elmhurst, IL, USA) according to Sekhon et al [6]. The particle retention (%) on U.S.-standard sieve numbers 16,20,30,40,50,70, and the pan after grinding was 17.8%, 17.3%, 17.6%, 12.9%, 11.2%, 9.2%, 7.7%, and 0.03%, respectively. The particles per gram were 119,335 and surface area (cm 2 /g) was 116.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%