1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990901)86:5<764::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment staging by endoscopic ultrasonography does not predict complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma

Abstract: BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) provides highly accurate preoperative T and N classifications in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Although previous data have suggested that patients with tumors classified as T4 by EUS do not benefit from surgical resection, these data were acquired prior to the widespread use of preoperative chemoradiation. The current study investigated whether pretreatment EUS can predict a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS Patients with esophageal carcinoma (a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2,13,14 Clinical response evaluation based on WHO criteria 15 is known to be highly inaccurate in esophageal cancer using conventional staging modalities, including barium swallow, endoscopy, endosonography, or CT of chest and abdomen. 16,30,31 Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose might offer improved specificity and accuracy for clinical response evaluation 32,33 or response prediction. 34 It has been shown, however, that PET imaging clearly improves staging of esophageal cancers primarily through increased sensitivity and specificity in the detection of distant metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,13,14 Clinical response evaluation based on WHO criteria 15 is known to be highly inaccurate in esophageal cancer using conventional staging modalities, including barium swallow, endoscopy, endosonography, or CT of chest and abdomen. 16,30,31 Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18-fluorodeoxyglucose might offer improved specificity and accuracy for clinical response evaluation 32,33 or response prediction. 34 It has been shown, however, that PET imaging clearly improves staging of esophageal cancers primarily through increased sensitivity and specificity in the detection of distant metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Maximal tumor area can measured at EUS and patients with a 50% or greater reduction in this index following chemoradiation are more likely to show tumor regression and lesions confined to the esophagus at the time of resection, in addition to having a survival advantage. 14,[18][19][20] Studies detailing this criterion, however, have been small. The current work uses a simple, universally applicable measure of tumor response and has demonstrated survival benefit amongst responders as compared to non-responders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been reports that it is difficult to detect a histological CR in the case of extremely small residual tumors by EUS. [12][13][14] This may be because correct diagnosis is affected by consequences of neoadjuvant therapy, such as necrosis, fibrosis, inflammation and soft tissue reaction. 12,[14][15][16] In the present study, Grade 3 was not detected well by measurement of tumor thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%