2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment of garlic powder using sweep frequency ultrasound and single frequency countercurrent ultrasound: Optimization and comparison for ACE inhibitory activities

Abstract: The sweep frequency ultrasound (SFU) and single frequency countercurrent ultrasound (SFCU) pretreatments were modeled and compared based on production of angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory peptides from garlic hydrolysates. Two mathematical models were developed to show the effect of each variable and their combinatorial interactions on ACE inhibitory activity. The optimum levels of the parameters in SFU were determined using uniform design, which revealed these as follows: total ultrasonic time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The schematic diagram (Figure a) and the actual optical image (Figure b) (Wen, Zhang, Yao, et al, ) are herein represented. The device is classified under the low‐frequency (kHz range) ultrasound devices (Ma et al, ). The MFSU is typical for the countercurrent divergent ultrasonic process, which ensures continuous action and dynamic countercurrent treatment/extraction of the material, and improves production efficiency (Wen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The schematic diagram (Figure a) and the actual optical image (Figure b) (Wen, Zhang, Yao, et al, ) are herein represented. The device is classified under the low‐frequency (kHz range) ultrasound devices (Ma et al, ). The MFSU is typical for the countercurrent divergent ultrasonic process, which ensures continuous action and dynamic countercurrent treatment/extraction of the material, and improves production efficiency (Wen et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound technology has been explored as an eco‐friendly and green processing technology requiring no toxic chemical application (Bermúdez‐Aguirre, Mobbs, & Barbosa‐Cánovas, ; Malomo, Onuh, Girgih, & Aluko, ; Uluko et al, ). Several researchers have proven the valuable influence of ultrasonic pretreatment on either extraction, structural, functional, or enzymatic hydrolysis efficiency of food materials like corn gluten meal, rice protein, tea residue, garlic powder, sunflower meal, and rapeseed protein (Ayim, Ma, Alenyorege, Ali, & Donkor, ; Dabbour et al, ; Jin, Ma, Qu, et al, ; Jin, Ma, Wang, et al, ; Jin et al, ; Li et al, ; Ma, Huang, Peng, Wang, & Yang, ; Yagoub, Ma, & Zhou, ). The improved enzymolysis parameters such as the initial rate of reaction ( k ) and energy (enthalpy, entropy, and Gibbs free energy) efficiency were accredited to the impact of ultrasonication (Dabbour et al, ; Uluko et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The probe was submerged in the suspension to a depth of 2 cm and the temperature was kept constant at 318 K. Sonication conditions were pulsed on‐time of 3 s and off‐time of 2 s, circulation pump speed of 100 rpm (BT 300, YZ‐1515; Changzhou Chenghe Sanitary Equipment Factory, Jiangsu Province, Changzhou, China). and time of 10 min . For enzymolysis kinetics, NaCas suspensions of different concentrations (10, 12.5, 15, 17.5 and 20 g L −1 , w/v) were sonicated as before.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a green, safe, efficient and new non‐thermal physical processing technology, ultrasound (sound waves > 20 kHz) (Demirdöven & Baysal, 2008) is applicable in the field of food processing (Chemat et al, 2017; Mason, Paniwnyk, & Lorimer, 1996). UAE has gained popularity in improving extraction processes (Ma, Huang, Peng, Wang, & Yang, 2015; Wen, Zhang, Zhang, et al, 2018). Literature propound enhanced functional and structural properties of protein isolates in pea, soy, and rice proteins (O'Sullivan, Murray, Flynn, & Norton, 2016); black pea proteins (Jiang et al, 2014); soybean protein (Huang, Ding, Dai, & Ma, 2017); and sunflower meal (Dabbour, He, Ma, & Musa, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%