2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2014.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment of algal biomass using fungal crude enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional mechanical or chemical pretreatment methods that are used to harvest algal biomass and disrupt algal cells require a large energy input and are costintensive (Prajapati et al, 2015). To this end, algaeassociated microbes offer several new alternatives for microalgae harvest and cell wall disruption.…”
Section: Downstream Processing Of Algal Biomass Using Symbiontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional mechanical or chemical pretreatment methods that are used to harvest algal biomass and disrupt algal cells require a large energy input and are costintensive (Prajapati et al, 2015). To this end, algaeassociated microbes offer several new alternatives for microalgae harvest and cell wall disruption.…”
Section: Downstream Processing Of Algal Biomass Using Symbiontsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breaking down lignin, disrupting the crystalline structure of cellulose and increasing its surface can be attained by pre-treatment methods, so that micro-organisms can more easily access the cellulose [24]. Both components, cellulose and lignin are present in algae structures; macro-algae have a similar structure to lignocellulosic materials, whereas most of the micro-algae species cell wall is composed of cellulose, hemicellulose/xylan and chitin structured in multiple layers [25,26]. Although performing pre-treatment makes the process more complicated and expensive, it can improve the process efficiency and reduce the whole cost so that a positive energy balance can be obtained compared with non-pre-treated biomass [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Biomethane Potential (or BMP) testing of thirty one different microalgal species demonstrated methane yields ranging from 30% to 60% (42% for Nannochloropsis) of the theoretically predicted values, [11,[22][23][24] reflecting a compelling need for improvement. Previous studies have indicated thermal [25], microwave [26], alkaline [27], acid [28], enzymatic [29,30], or thermo-alkaline [31] pretreatment strategies offer promising options for overcoming algal biomass recalcitrance. However, these efforts have been limited to batch processing of whole microalgae and have not involved treatment of the LEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%