2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion: Current state and challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
115
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 295 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
115
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of chemical pretreatment, cost of reagents, and operation such as the extra step for neutralization and the requirement for corrosion resistant reactors are the known limitations [178]. Additionally, the formation of inhibitory compounds is a point to be considered since it can inhibit or significantly reduce the conversion efficiency of hydrolyzates of lignocellulosic biomass to methane.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of chemical pretreatment, cost of reagents, and operation such as the extra step for neutralization and the requirement for corrosion resistant reactors are the known limitations [178]. Additionally, the formation of inhibitory compounds is a point to be considered since it can inhibit or significantly reduce the conversion efficiency of hydrolyzates of lignocellulosic biomass to methane.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fermentation process is usually hindered by various factors related to the nature of the substrate, such as nutrient balance, pH, or the presence of toxins and inhibitors [5]. The organic matter that can be used in the anaerobic digestion process is diverse [6]. Studies have reported various solid wastes being used, such as waste sludge from water treatment plants, agricultural livestock waste, and lignocellulosic waste [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been subject of increasing research investigating numerous different techniques such as mechanical, chemical, thermal and biological processes (e.g. Hendriks & Zeeman, 2009;Zheng et al, 2014;Carrere et al, 2016;Paudel et al, 2017). However, the key issue is on assessing the real benefit of pretreatment in real conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to EBA data (EBA, 2018) on electric energy and biomethane production, the global actual biogas production in Europe is around 35 billion m 3 per year. The implementation of innovative and effective pre-treatments, isolated and/or combined, expanding the range of potential feedstock can make the sector even more robust, and biogas production could be increased by 20-30% (Paudel et al, 2017) equivalent to 7 to 10.5 billion m 3 biogas per year. If we consider to substituting the energy produced from coal, which determines an emission of 0.94 kgCO 2 -eq per kWh produced, with this renewable energy source we can expect a net reduction in CO 2 emissions in the range of 15-22 million tonCO 2 -eq per year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%