1995
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)00052-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment dropout as a function of treatment delay and client variables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
5
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some useful procedures include providing personal introductions to treatment staff, arranging immediate initial intake assessments or regular clinic visits (Festinger et al, 1995;Stasiewicz & Stalker, 1999), and regular telephone reminders to sustain motivation (Gariti et al, 1995). With respect to AA, providers can introduce patients to an AA sponsor or recovery guide, address potential barriers such as lack of transportation and childcare services, and maintain contact to enhance continuing attendance (Johnson & Chappel, 1994).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some useful procedures include providing personal introductions to treatment staff, arranging immediate initial intake assessments or regular clinic visits (Festinger et al, 1995;Stasiewicz & Stalker, 1999), and regular telephone reminders to sustain motivation (Gariti et al, 1995). With respect to AA, providers can introduce patients to an AA sponsor or recovery guide, address potential barriers such as lack of transportation and childcare services, and maintain contact to enhance continuing attendance (Johnson & Chappel, 1994).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prevalence estimates range from 15% to as high as 75% (Kicklighter, 2001). Reports over the last 30 years regarding first session nonattendance in community mental health centers and other outpatient clinics consistently report non-engagement rates approximating one-third to one-half of all intakes (Evans, 1999;Festinger, Lamb, Kountz, Kirby, & Marlowe, 1995;Hochstadt & Trybula, 1980;Raynes & Warren, 1971). Although intake procedures vary from clinic to clinic, for the purpose of this study, an intake is broadly defined as the process in which a potential client contacts a provider for therapy and sets an initial appointment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Algunas provienen del propio paciente, como la falta de motivación, la creencia que uno mismo puede manejar el problema sin necesidad de tratamiento, o que los tratamientos que se ofrecen son de escasa calidad y no son efectivos. Otras barreras provienen de la organización asistencial: complejidad en los mecanismos de admisión a tratamiento de estos pacientes, escasa empatía por esta patología, saturación de los dispositivos asistenciales, desconocimiento de los servicios de tratamiento y dificultades de accesibilidad geográficas [2][3][4][5][6][7] . Y finalmente las actitudes negativas de los trabajadores de la salud respecto de los trastornos adictivos [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] pueden influir no sólo en la calidad de la atención 16,17,19 sino también dificultar el acceso al tratamiento de estos pacientes 20 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified