2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretreatment axillary ultrasonography and core biopsy in patients with suspected breast cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and impact on management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
31
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Benign sonographic features are a predominantly hyperechoic LN due to fat replacement, the presence of a thin homogeneous symmetrical cortical rim around the hyperechoic hilar fat, and symmetric cortical lobulations similar to contralateral ALNs [13.] Suspicious or metastatic nodes may have thickening or eccentric lobulation of the hypoechoic cortical rim, compression or displacement of the fatty hyperechoic hilum, or complete replacement of the hilar fat by hypoechoic tissue [14]. However, sensitivity of gray-scale U/S alone in detection of malignant ALNs is reported to range from 42% to 56% and specificity from 70% to 90% [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benign sonographic features are a predominantly hyperechoic LN due to fat replacement, the presence of a thin homogeneous symmetrical cortical rim around the hyperechoic hilar fat, and symmetric cortical lobulations similar to contralateral ALNs [13.] Suspicious or metastatic nodes may have thickening or eccentric lobulation of the hypoechoic cortical rim, compression or displacement of the fatty hyperechoic hilum, or complete replacement of the hilar fat by hypoechoic tissue [14]. However, sensitivity of gray-scale U/S alone in detection of malignant ALNs is reported to range from 42% to 56% and specificity from 70% to 90% [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pathology assessment was performed before nast in our cohort, the most common method was fine-needle aspiration or core-needle biopsy. The accuracy of those methods has been investigated, and in clinically suspicious lymph nodes, the sensitivity falls into the 60%-70% range, with the specificity approaching 100% 14,15,27 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic imaging-including ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, or combined positron-emission tomography and computed tomography-does not have sufficient specificity or sensitivity to replace pathology assessment 14,15 . Several recent publications have shown a lower risk of recurrence after pathologic complete response; however, a pathologic complete response after nast does not entirely eliminate the risk of recurrence [16][17][18][19] [a question that is currently under examination (https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01872975)].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound (US) is a simple and well-accepted method to examine axillary and non-axillary lymph nodes associated with breast cancer. Recent publications have reported that routine axillary US combined with cytology or core biopsy is an effective method to evaluate lymph node metastases prior to surgery [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. Thus, pretreatment axillary US for early breast cancer patients and needle sampling of morphologically abnormal lymph nodes are now widely recommended [36].…”
Section: Background and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%