2015
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pretransplant dyslipidaemia influences primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation

Abstract: Dyslipidaemia seems to be an independent risk factor for PGD after lung transplantation: low circulating levels of HDL-C and hypertriglyceridaemia increase the incidence of PGD. Even if HDL-C levels are difficult to alter today, triglyceride and cholesterol levels can be addressed therapeutically and may have a positive influence on the development of PGD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The main findings of our study are that PH is not associated with the development of PGD3 after LTX in our single‐center patient cohort; in our cohort, only low HDL‐C was identified as a risk factor for PGD3. As such, these data are along the line of findings we previously reported …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main findings of our study are that PH is not associated with the development of PGD3 after LTX in our single‐center patient cohort; in our cohort, only low HDL‐C was identified as a risk factor for PGD3. As such, these data are along the line of findings we previously reported …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Second, the study confirmed our previous findings showing that HDL‐C levels are inversely associated with the development of PGD3 with higher levels of HDL‐C showing less PGD3 and vice versa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several studies have found an association between recipient increased body mass index and increased risk of PGD. Most of them have been analyzed in two successive systematic reviews and meta‐analyses ; others have been described more recently . Moreover, Shah et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%