2018
DOI: 10.1101/440198
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presynaptic NMDA receptors cooperate with local action potentials to implement activity-dependent GABA release from the reciprocal olfactory bulb granule cell spine

Abstract: AbstractIn the rodent olfactory bulb the smooth dendrites of the principal glutamatergic mitral cells (MCs) form reciprocal dendrodendritic synapses with large spines on GABAergic granule cells (GC), where unitary release of glutamate can trigger postsynaptic local activation of voltage-gated Na+-channels (Navs), i.e. a spine spike. Can such single MC inputs evoke reciprocal release? We find that unitary-like activation via two-photon u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is often observed at repetitively stimulated synapses (Wen et al, 2013), which would also hold true for the classical DDI protocol, where voltage-clamped mitral cells are being depolarized for 20-50 ms and thus ongoing release of glutamate from mitral cells is likely to happen over dozens of ms and subsequent asynchronous release of GABA has been documented by many groups (see Introduction). Thus it is at first surprising that local, unitary-like stimulation of GC spines by TPU would suffice to elicit asynchronous release, which we have recently documented (Lage-Rupprecht et al, 2020). However, the temporal extent of this asynchronous release was shorter than in the classical DDI experiments (maximal extent of ~500 ms vs > 1 s) and therefore there might be additional mechanisms involved whenever GCs are activated more strongly.…”
Section: Relation Between Ca 2+ and Na + Transients In The Gc Spine Hmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is often observed at repetitively stimulated synapses (Wen et al, 2013), which would also hold true for the classical DDI protocol, where voltage-clamped mitral cells are being depolarized for 20-50 ms and thus ongoing release of glutamate from mitral cells is likely to happen over dozens of ms and subsequent asynchronous release of GABA has been documented by many groups (see Introduction). Thus it is at first surprising that local, unitary-like stimulation of GC spines by TPU would suffice to elicit asynchronous release, which we have recently documented (Lage-Rupprecht et al, 2020). However, the temporal extent of this asynchronous release was shorter than in the classical DDI experiments (maximal extent of ~500 ms vs > 1 s) and therefore there might be additional mechanisms involved whenever GCs are activated more strongly.…”
Section: Relation Between Ca 2+ and Na + Transients In The Gc Spine Hmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Since on the other hand there is also a fast, synchronous component of reciprocal release (Halabisky et al, 2000;Lage-Rupprecht et al, 2020), GC spines are obviously capable of parallel processing on multiple time scales, a property that appears to be further refined with maturation. (C) Cumulative plots of (ΔF/F) TPU amplitudes in dendrite and spine pairs (highly significantly different: P < 0.001, Wilcoxon test), and of rise times and half durations t 1/2 of (ΔF/F) TPU within the spine heads (mostly not detectable in the dendrites).…”
Section: Postsynaptic Ca 2+ Signals In Adult Mouse Versus Juvenile Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dendritic excitability in granule cells already sets in with single-spine activation, because a single mitral/tufted cell input can trigger a local Na + -spike within the spine [15]. This spine spike can cause reciprocal release of GABA via gating of high-voltage-activated Ca v s [16]. Activation of larger numbers of spines is observed to result in global low-threshold Ca 2+ -spikes, which are mediated by T-type Ca v s [17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the complex as a whole is undescribed, several members are known to interact, physically or functionally. For instance, N-cadherin and AMPA receptors interact at the cell surface (Nuriya and Huganir, 2006;Saglietti et al, 2007;Silverman et al, 2007) , AMPA receptors and Na v channels are both involved in postsynaptic depolarization (Bywalez et al, 2015;Lage-Rupprecht et al, 2019) , and EFR3b is a membrane scaffolding protein involved in the synthesis of PIP2, a lipid that regulates AMPA receptor activity (Seebohm et al, 2014) and trafficking (McCartney et al, 2014) . In flies, knock-down of the EFR3 homolog "rolling blackout" severely affects neuronal function, but primarily in the pre-synapse (Huang et al, 2004(Huang et al, , 2006 .…”
Section: Co-fractionation Broadly Recovers Neural Protein Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%