2015
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000001286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presurgical Nasoalveolar Molding for Cleft Lip and Palate

Abstract: Therapeutic, IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An example that takes advantage of the power of CAD in 3D printing is the use of patient-specific maxillary models that were digitally designed to predict the molding stages in the treatment of children with cleft lip and palate. The predicted anatomy was 3D printed and used to design appliances for presurgical nasoalveolar molding of the cleft lip and plate (99).…”
Section: Anatomic Models: Pre-surgical Manipulation and Selection Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example that takes advantage of the power of CAD in 3D printing is the use of patient-specific maxillary models that were digitally designed to predict the molding stages in the treatment of children with cleft lip and palate. The predicted anatomy was 3D printed and used to design appliances for presurgical nasoalveolar molding of the cleft lip and plate (99).…”
Section: Anatomic Models: Pre-surgical Manipulation and Selection Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the included studies, the one introducing three-dimensional technology report that NAM using three-dimensional technology has the potential to further decrease the cost of treatment by reducing the clinical chair time and the cost of NAM appliance [ 53,54 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies that evaluated CAM system, one prospective study and one randomized control trial were selected [ 53 , 64 ]. Both showed that this method is a more efficient, more precise and more predictable technology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost of a medium quality IOS, ranging from 15000 to 30000 EUR, is surely not comparable with the pure cost of classical impression materials and trays used during a T&P protocol, but, considering that the use of IOS diffusion is rapidly increasing because they can be used in several fields, the cost-per-single use is gradually decreasing, in direct proportion with use. Furthermore, digitally simulating progressive changes in cleft anatomy make it possible to prepare the entire set of molding plates in advance, reducing the need for frequent visits for plate adjustments [53,54]. Nevertheless, the intraoral scanning process, with no risk of impression material inhalation, can be performed without patient transportation to the dental clinic, if a portable IOS is used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%