2003
DOI: 10.1177/152692480301300104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Presumed Consent and other Predictors of Cadaveric Organ Donation in Europe

Abstract: Findings may be useful to academics and professionals responsible for organ procurement. Additional research is necessary for practical application of findings. Generalizing these findings beyond Europe may be problematic because of external validity constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
49
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to correctly identify the impact of presumed consent on deceased donations, we included family consent and donor registry variables in columns (4) and (5) as well as all the relevant interactions of presumed consent, family consent and donor registry variables in column (6). 12 Based on the estimation results displayed in the last column of PC and IC denote ''presumed consent'' and ''informed consent'', respectively. FC and NFC denote ''family consent is always sought'' and ''family consent is not always sought'', respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to correctly identify the impact of presumed consent on deceased donations, we included family consent and donor registry variables in columns (4) and (5) as well as all the relevant interactions of presumed consent, family consent and donor registry variables in column (6). 12 Based on the estimation results displayed in the last column of PC and IC denote ''presumed consent'' and ''informed consent'', respectively. FC and NFC denote ''family consent is always sought'' and ''family consent is not always sought'', respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in the US, a first-person-informed consent system has been implemented by which organ procurement is solely based on the documented intent of the donor and the organs of a registered deceased donor are removed even if the family objects. 1 Most of the European countries have adopted presumed consent legislation, and it is suggested that presumed consent can play an important role in increasing donation rates [1,12,17,21]. However, disunity continues within the medical community and experts have expressed their skepticism whether any change in legislation per se could increase donations [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In theory, there seem to be considerable differences in the efficiency of donor procurement between consent systems. But, there is a lot of debate as to whether in practice the efficiency of a presumed consent system prevails over the efficiency of an explicit consent system [21,[43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]. Gevers et al report that because next of kin play an important role in obtaining consent for organ donation in each country, in reality consent systems are more similar than suggested by the explicit/presumed consent distinction [41,49,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Changing to another consent system will not incur legal objections, since it still leaves room for people to express their wishes and provides a guarantee for their right to physical integrity. The international literature provides diverging views regarding the impact of introducing a presumed consent system on increasing the supply of donor organs [21,43,[46][47][48][49][50][51]. However, international comparative research linking procurement rates to consent systems, while controlling for differences in mortality rates, suggests the impact of such a change to be limited [41,44,45,48,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%