1994
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90092-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prestimulation-induced modulation of the P300 component of event related potentials accompanying startle in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, both sleep polysomnographies (25,26) and the modulation of p300 amplitudes and latencies in acoustically evoked potentials (32) were no dierent in nocturnal enuretics. There was, however, a tendency toward more pathological EEGs among the day wetters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, both sleep polysomnographies (25,26) and the modulation of p300 amplitudes and latencies in acoustically evoked potentials (32) were no dierent in nocturnal enuretics. There was, however, a tendency toward more pathological EEGs among the day wetters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The probe N100 reflects early perceptual processing of auditory stimuli and is enhanced when participants are instructed to attend to the startle probe while viewing unpleasant relative to pleasant or neutral pictures (Cuthbert et al, 1998). In addition to the probe N100, the startle probe P300 is a positive deflection of the ERP signal that is maximal at centroparietal sites and occurs approximately 300 ms after the onset of the startle probe (Putnam & Roth, 1990; Roth, Dorato, & Kopell, 1984; Sugawara, Sadeghpour, Traversay, & Ornitz, 1994). The probe P300 reflects attention toward the startle probe and is reduced when viewing emotional relative to neutral pictures due to increased attention to emotional foreground stimuli (leaving less attention allocated to the probe itself) (Bradley, Codispoti, & Lang, 2006; Cuthbert, Schupp, Bradley, McManis, & Lang, 1998; Schupp, Cuthbert, Bradley, Birbaumer, & Lang, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitude of the P300 startle ERP has been demonstrated to respond to both PPI and PPF, task determinants, as well as allocation of attention, changes in arousal, and emotional context. (see Roth et al, 1982,1984; Putnam and Roth 1987, 1990; Ford and Pfefferbaum, 1991; Suguwara et al, 1994; Hirano et al 1996; Schupp et.al., 1997, Cuthbert et al, 1998; Ornitz et al, 2001). The neural generators of the P300 to startling noises are not entirely known.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%