SAE Technical Paper Series 1999
DOI: 10.4271/1999-01-0496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure-Swirl Atomization in the Near Field

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
78
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(1), and a correlation for the coefficient has been suggested [36]. Later, Schmidt et al [37] estimated the velocity coefficient from a typical value (0.78) of the discharge coefficient of a single nozzle with sharp inlet corners by reducing the value by 10% for extra momentum losses, such that (2) where θ is the half of spray angle and d n is the nozzle diameter. This velocity coefficient agrees with the definition of the discharge coefficient.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1), and a correlation for the coefficient has been suggested [36]. Later, Schmidt et al [37] estimated the velocity coefficient from a typical value (0.78) of the discharge coefficient of a single nozzle with sharp inlet corners by reducing the value by 10% for extra momentum losses, such that (2) where θ is the half of spray angle and d n is the nozzle diameter. This velocity coefficient agrees with the definition of the discharge coefficient.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the nozzle's discharge coefficient (C D ) of 0.7 is used for the injection velocity calculation in the present outwardly opening hollow-cone spray simulations. From Schmidt et al [37], the initial sheet thickness of the liquid film (t 0 ) can be obtained from the known mass flow rate (ṁ) and the injection velocity (U) by (3) The calculated liquid sheet thickness is a starting point in our spray modeling regardless of breakup or collision models. In the present study, modified KH-RT is implemented.…”
Section: Numerical Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a common approximation made in phenomenological modeling of atomizers in cases where only one flow velocity scale is available (Lefebvre 1989;Razzaghi 1989;Schmidt et al 1999;Senecal et al 1999). …”
Section: Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure-swirling and inwardly-opening hollow-cone spray injector has been commonly utilized in GDI and GCI engines due to its efficient atomization with relatively wide spray angle and fine atomization [6,7,8]. Recently, the outwardly-opening piezoelectric injector is gaining popularity as a high efficient hollow-cone spray injector due to its precise control of the spray by accurate piezoelectric actuator [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been known that the typical KelvinHelmholtz and Rayleigh-Taylor (KH-RT) breakup model is unable to describe the hollow-cone spray because the liquid is injected with circular-shaped liquid sheet instead of a cylindrical blob. As such, Schmidt et al [7] proposed the linear instability sheet atomization (LISA) model by assuming toroidal ligament breakup for pressureswirl hollow-cone spray injectors, where the Taylor analogy breakup (TAB) was used as a secondary breakup model after primary LISA breakup. The LISA-TAB model was further applied to the outwardlyopening injector by assuming slug flow, although linear instability theory was unable to model the actual breakups of expanding 3-D liquid sheets [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%