2022
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06896-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure support and positive end-expiratory pressure versus T-piece during spontaneous breathing trial in difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation: study protocol for the SBT-ICU study

Abstract: Background Spontaneous breathing trials are performed in critically ill intubated patients in order to assess readiness to be weaned from mechanical ventilation. In patients with difficult weaning (i.e. not extubated after their first SBT), performing SBT using pressure support with or without positive end-expiratory pressure or using T-piece is debated. As ventilatory support during SBT is greater on pressure support than on T-piece and as positive end-expiratory pressure can prevent weaning-i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we suggest that the proper method of SBT should be decided individually based on each patient’s condition, as assessed in a careful evaluation by the clinician. Furthermore, these recommendations might change depending on the results of an ongoing, large-scale RCT [ 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we suggest that the proper method of SBT should be decided individually based on each patient’s condition, as assessed in a careful evaluation by the clinician. Furthermore, these recommendations might change depending on the results of an ongoing, large-scale RCT [ 52 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was a monocentric prospective open label, randomized controlled superiority trial with 2 parallel groups and balanced randomization with a 1:1 ratio. The trial protocol was previously published [ 7 ]. The study was conducted in one ICU located in a French academic hospital and was registered at clinicalTrials.gov (NCT03861117) before the inclusion of the first patient.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prespecified secondary outcomes were the following: rate of successful extubation on the first extubation attempt; invasive mechanical ventilation duration (after inclusion); mechanical (invasive and non-invasive) ventilation duration after inclusion; ventilator-free days at day-28 and day-90; ICU and hospital length of stay after inclusion; ICU, day-28 and day-90 mortality; and reintubation rate. Minor modifications occurred to some secondary outcomes after trial onset and before database lock to improve reproducibility with comparable studies [ 7 ]. Computation of reintubation rate was modified and post hoc additional outcomes were added during the reviewing process (Additional file 8 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%