1980
DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-53-635-1031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure standardized lumbar discography

Abstract: The basic procedure for carrying out clinical lumbar discography has been examined. As a consequence, a pressure-standardized injection technique has been established. It is shown that monitoring the flow of contrast medium into the disc can, in the case of a true nuclear injection, improve the diagnostic efficiency. Additionally, knowledge of this flow can help to avoid a commonly occurring, but not often recognized, artefact described in detail elsewhere (Quinnell and Stockdale, 1980).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of injecting a fixed amount of contrast medium regardless of the degree of deterioration of the disk has also been addressed by other authors (31,33). Like us, some injected a larger volume in the more degenerated disks (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem of injecting a fixed amount of contrast medium regardless of the degree of deterioration of the disk has also been addressed by other authors (31,33). Like us, some injected a larger volume in the more degenerated disks (33).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…It is explained by filling of a false cavity without opacification of the major part of the nucleus, which represents the true nuclear cavity. This problem can be reduced by the use of a multi-hole needle (30,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of a classification of pressure patters [26] correlated with artefactsusceptible [27,42] discograms [7,8], we propose welldefined threshold values [e.g. 585 mmHg at 45 s[ that indicate severe histological changes (this value equals the median of the 45-s pressures normal distribution; below that limit the corresponding score values were significantly higher than above, as already mentioned).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which increase the intra-discal pressure ( 105 , 106 ). The pressures are measured at the tip of the needle ( 107 ) to reflect the inherent pressure within the disc (opening pressure), pressure when pain is felt (pain pressure), maximum pressure generated (maximum pressure) and the amount of pain felt (usually a numeric rating pain scale) by the patient as well as the total amount of contrast injected ( 108 ). Along with the intensity of pain, the concordance of pain is also considered as an important parameter.…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%