2020
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202070027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Sensors: Highly Sensitive Conformal Pressure Sensing Coatings Based on Thermally Expandable Microspheres (Adv. Mater. Technol. 5/2020)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the maximum withstandable pressure limits (i.e., yield strength, the amount of pressure that the sensor can endure without permanent change) are 460 kPa in the soft mode and 7.43 MPa in the rigid mode (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Considering that the pressure applied by a moving motorcycle (weighing about 170 kg) is 3.5 MPa, [ 72 ] it is obvious that our tunable sensor is mechanically robust. Our GM‐TPS achieves significantly higher sensitivity and a broader dynamic range through mode conversion, compared to state‐of‐the‐art capacitive sensors with a dynamic range of larger than 3 kPa (Figure 3f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the maximum withstandable pressure limits (i.e., yield strength, the amount of pressure that the sensor can endure without permanent change) are 460 kPa in the soft mode and 7.43 MPa in the rigid mode (Figure S8, Supporting Information). Considering that the pressure applied by a moving motorcycle (weighing about 170 kg) is 3.5 MPa, [ 72 ] it is obvious that our tunable sensor is mechanically robust. Our GM‐TPS achieves significantly higher sensitivity and a broader dynamic range through mode conversion, compared to state‐of‐the‐art capacitive sensors with a dynamic range of larger than 3 kPa (Figure 3f).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our GM‐TPS achieves significantly higher sensitivity and a broader dynamic range through mode conversion, compared to state‐of‐the‐art capacitive sensors with a dynamic range of larger than 3 kPa (Figure 3f). [ 23,58,64,72–88 ] In the soft mode, the sensor has sensitivity of 16.97 kPa −1 within 0–1 kPa, 7.57 kPa −1 within 1–5 kPa, 2.47 kPa −1 within 5–10 kPa, 1.42 kPa −1 within 10–20 kPa, and 0.31 kPa −1 within 20–50 kPa. This result reveals that compared to reported contemporary sensors, our sensor has significantly higher sensitivity in the lower pressure range of 0–10 kPa, especially achieving a 452% improvement over the highest sensitivity of the state‐of‐the‐art sensors (3.13 kPa −1 ) in the 0–1 kPa range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the sensitivity is relatively small, hence it is difficult to monitor subtle movements in human activities. [ 33–38 ] Human physical activities are diverse, thus, sensors with different ranges and sensitivity are required to thoroughly monitor all kinds of activities. [ 39 ] In addition to the aforementioned drawbacks, existing pressure sensors are cumbersome to manufacture and utilize expensive materials, which is a major limitation to their development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement of the sensitivity of capacitive pressure sensors is achieved by various strategies. These include the use of micropatterned dielectric layers or electrode surfaces, [ 31 ] nanofibrous membranes, [ 6,33 ] dielectric layers with microspheres [ 34,35 ] and ionic‐liquid active dielectric layers. [ 36–38 ] The capacitive pressure sensors based on micro/nano patterned or ionic‐liquid activated structures show promising sensitivity and quick response to external stimuli.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%