2013
DOI: 10.1021/la402798f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Reentrant Assembly: Direct Simulation of Volumes of Micellization

Abstract: Surfactants exhibit maxima in their critical micelle concentrations upon application of hydrostatic pressure, which is attributable to changes in their volumes of micellization from positive to negative values with increasing pressure. We present a direct molecular simulation analysis of the volumes of micellization of an anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactant in aqueous solution at pressures up to 2500 bar. Excellent agreement with experiment is observed. A Kirkwood-Buff theory analysis based on proximal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing temperature, the association volume becomes positive and pressure drives hydrophobic assemblies apart above the crossover temperature. Our observations and their qualitative agreement with experiment suggest hydrophobic interactions between individual nonpolar moieties do not drive pressure-induced increases in the critical micelle concentration of surfactants 55 or protein denaturation. 56 Subsequently, pressure effects on mesoscale assembly should account for the volumetric properties for the full hydrophobic assembly.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…With increasing temperature, the association volume becomes positive and pressure drives hydrophobic assemblies apart above the crossover temperature. Our observations and their qualitative agreement with experiment suggest hydrophobic interactions between individual nonpolar moieties do not drive pressure-induced increases in the critical micelle concentration of surfactants 55 or protein denaturation. 56 Subsequently, pressure effects on mesoscale assembly should account for the volumetric properties for the full hydrophobic assembly.…”
Section: ■ Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…While counterintuitive, this negative partial molar compressibility is not thermodynamically inconsistent, as the second law only constrains the sign of the overall system compressibility but not that of any individual component of a mixture. Indeed, negative partial compressibilities have been observed for surfactants 99,100 and ions 101,102 in aqueous solution and from molecular simulations of alcohols and hydrocarbons in water. 17 The solute partial compressibility impacts the concentration dependence of the system compressibility.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 10 has been used by several authors. 5 , 20 , 23 , 24 , 28 30 Due to the nonspherical geometry of proteins, the integration in eq 11 is more difficult to perform if one is interested in a surface based approach. 28 Similarly, Hirata and colleagues have derived statistical mechanical expressions for the infinitely dilute partial molar volumes using the Reference Interaction Site Model (RISM) integral equation theory coupled to KB theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%