2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.02.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure projection stabilized finite element method for Stokes problem with nonlinear slip boundary conditions

Abstract: a b s t r a c tIn this paper, we consider the pressure projection stabilized finite element method for the Stokes problem with nonlinear slip boundary conditions whose variational formulation is the variational inequality problem of the second kind with the Stokes operator. The H 1 and L 2 error estimates for the velocity and the L 2 error estimate for the pressure are obtained. Finally, the numerical results are displayed to verify the theoretical analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is done in the following proposition. Proposition 3.6 Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2, we have that u | Ω 0 = u 0 and p | Ω 0 = p 0 , where (u 0 , p 0 , λ 0 ) is solution of (13)- (15) with d = (0, 0) and u and p are the weak limits in (23) and (24).…”
Section: Passing To the Limit D →mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is done in the following proposition. Proposition 3.6 Under the hypotheses of Theorem 1.2, we have that u | Ω 0 = u 0 and p | Ω 0 = p 0 , where (u 0 , p 0 , λ 0 ) is solution of (13)- (15) with d = (0, 0) and u and p are the weak limits in (23) and (24).…”
Section: Passing To the Limit D →mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…is the solution of (13)- (15) for the corresponding d. This is done in the next section, where a priori estimates independent of d are obtained. From these estimates follows the existence of weak limits of each sequence (up to a subsequence).…”
Section: F Is a Continuous Operatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations