1991
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/28/4/008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Measurements with the Mercury Melting Line Referred to ITS-90

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these differences, the values found are substantially the same, each being within the experimen-tal uncertainty of the other and within the quoted uncertainty of the current accepted value. 5,9,10 The best value of the 1953 experiment is closer to the accepted value than that of 1962. The 1953 error band is larger because only the smaller prototype dead weight tester was available at the time.…”
Section: ͑8͒mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Despite these differences, the values found are substantially the same, each being within the experimen-tal uncertainty of the other and within the quoted uncertainty of the current accepted value. 5,9,10 The best value of the 1953 experiment is closer to the accepted value than that of 1962. The 1953 error band is larger because only the smaller prototype dead weight tester was available at the time.…”
Section: ͑8͒mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We then decompressed the DAC at a similar rate to a pressure of ~0.9 GPa. In both compression and decompression paths, we continuously measured luminescence signals every 0.25 seconds, while the mercury sample crossed its melting point [22]. In a pressure interval of 0.6 GPa, our compression (or decompression) rates allowed us to record 600-6000 luminescence spectra, providing fine recordings of the pressure conditions in the sample chamber.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the melting of pure H 2 O, Grasset [18] calibrated the ruby's R1-line shift in a pressure range of 0-1 GPa, resulting in a linear coefficient of 0.371±0.006 nm/GPa with a relative uncertainty of ±1.6%. Here, we report the calibration of the ruby luminescence line shift from the well-calibrated melting line of mercury which has a high precision of less than ±0.2 MPa [21,22]. The first AIRAPT task group on the International Practical Pressure Scale (IPPS) recommended the mercury melting line [21] be used as a pressure standard up to 1.2 GPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pressure was applied in piston-cylinder devices with internal diameters of 45 mm and the load was supplied by hydraulic presses. Values for the pressure, p, were calculated from the load using an empirical function obtained using a manganin pressure gauge calibrated against the Hg melting line [15]. The cylinders could either be cooled using liquid nitrogen or heated electrically and the temperature, T, was measured using a calibrated type K thermocouple close to the upper electrode.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%