1993
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/34.5.955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Increases, the Formation of Chromite Seams, and the Development of the Ultramafic Series in the Stillwater Complex, Montana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2.11). This model has classically been invoked for the formation of chromitite layers in Muskox, Bushveld and Stillwater (Irvine 1975(Irvine , 1977Lipin 1993) but also to the Only a small part of the system olivine-chromite-quartz ( grey field in the inset triangle) is represented and shows the stability fields of olivine, orthopyroxene and chromite. Boundary curves with double arrows are reaction boundaries, and cotectic curves are represented with a single arrow.…”
Section: Fig 210mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.11). This model has classically been invoked for the formation of chromitite layers in Muskox, Bushveld and Stillwater (Irvine 1975(Irvine , 1977Lipin 1993) but also to the Only a small part of the system olivine-chromite-quartz ( grey field in the inset triangle) is represented and shows the stability fields of olivine, orthopyroxene and chromite. Boundary curves with double arrows are reaction boundaries, and cotectic curves are represented with a single arrow.…”
Section: Fig 210mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An increase in pressure (Cameron, 1980;Lipin, 1993;Cawthorn, 2005) represents an elegant model as pressure changes would affect the entire chamber simultaneously. It is possible that the frequent replenishment of the Bushveld chamber with new magma pulses was responsible for multiple earthquakes and venting of the chamber resulting in pressure changes.…”
Section: Previously Proposed Models For the Formation Of The Chromitimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromitite formation has long been debated and several petrogenetic models exist (see Campbell and Murck, 1993;Naldrett et al, 2012), including: liquid immiscibility (McDonald, 1965), oxidation (Ulmer, 1969;Cameron and Desborough, 1969), pressure fluctuations (Lipin, 1993), and assimilation of silicic crustal rock by mafic magma (Irvine, 1975;Spandler et al, 2005). Studying ophiolites, Bédard and Hébert (1998) have demonstrated the formation of chromitite via assimilation of crustal pyroxenite and gabbro by picrite melt intrusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%