1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6777(1997)16:6<521::aid-nau2>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure-flow studies: An evaluation of within-testing reproducibility?validity of the measured parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are limited data regarding the normal residual urine volume in asymptomatic patients and until now no consensus has been reached to the relationship between residual urine, BOO and detrusor underactivity. In addition, the residual urine volume can vary over time especially in elderly patients 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited data regarding the normal residual urine volume in asymptomatic patients and until now no consensus has been reached to the relationship between residual urine, BOO and detrusor underactivity. In addition, the residual urine volume can vary over time especially in elderly patients 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability of PFS outcomes has been the subject of previous studies [van de Beek et al, 1992;Hansen et al, 1997;Madsen et al, 1995;Rosier et al, 1995;Tammela, 1999;Witjes et al, 1996]. Variability of PFS outcomes has been the subject of previous studies [van de Beek et al, 1992;Hansen et al, 1997;Madsen et al, 1995;Rosier et al, 1995;Tammela, 1999;Witjes et al, 1996].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In a recent study performed in our clinic, we found a moderate intra-patient reproducibility of PFS [Sonke et al, 1999]. However, better results concerning reproducibility were reported earlier [vd Beek et al, 1992;Madsen et al, 1995;Rosier et al, 1995;Hansen et al, 1997Hansen et al, , 1999. A distinction should be made between reproducibility within one session of two PFS and reproducibility of two PFS performed at different occasions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%