2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2019.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure field estimation from ultrasound Doppler velocity profiler for vortex-shedding flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If proper attention in not rendered, these noises can magnify in calculation of second component of velocity and subsequently in viscosity and pressure. Combination of temporal (FFT, fast Fourier transform) and spatial (POD, proper orthogonal decomposition) filtering in UVP data had proved very efficient for noise reduction with conserving coherent flow structures as explained in our previous work (Tiwari et al 2019). So, here we adopted the same filtering technique.…”
Section: Velocity Data Filteringmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If proper attention in not rendered, these noises can magnify in calculation of second component of velocity and subsequently in viscosity and pressure. Combination of temporal (FFT, fast Fourier transform) and spatial (POD, proper orthogonal decomposition) filtering in UVP data had proved very efficient for noise reduction with conserving coherent flow structures as explained in our previous work (Tiwari et al 2019). So, here we adopted the same filtering technique.…”
Section: Velocity Data Filteringmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…c for non-Newtonian flow (Tiwari et al, 2021). d UVP for Newtonian flow (Tiwari et al 2019). e UVP for non-Newtonian flow which is the present topic…”
Section: Test Fluid and Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations