2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.10.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure drop in CIM disk monolithic columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining equations (11), (12), (13), and (14), and differentiating DP 0 DP with respect to dn gives:…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining equations (11), (12), (13), and (14), and differentiating DP 0 DP with respect to dn gives:…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of ultra-short monolithic columns or , discs' (from 4 to 50 mm in length) attracts attention due to their potential for rapid separations of relatively simple samples, with applications in several areas, including biochemistry, pharmaceutical analysis and affinity chromatography [16][17][18]. At the same time, low column backpressures with such ultra-short columns allow the application of high flow rates (up to 5 mL/min) in order to further reduce retention times.…”
Section: Separation Of Nucleotides On Ultra-short Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such distribution provides enough surface to obtain high dynamic binding capacity as well as further reduces the pressure drop. Recently, it was demonstrated that the structure in fact exhibits a certain level of self-similarity (between 1.03 and 2.75) that results in two-fold lower pressure in comparison to an equivalent particle bed [62].…”
Section: Structure Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%