1973
DOI: 10.1021/j100640a025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of weak acid ionization in aqueous buffers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
193
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
193
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Tris concentration was 0.05 M or 0.1 M, as specified. Tris salt was chosen for this study since its ionization constant is not altered by pressure [16]. Pressure-induced changes in the ionization states of the protein arise as a direct result of pressure on the protein and do not involve the surrounding solvent, since Tris, regardless of its buffering power, is insensitive to pressure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Tris concentration was 0.05 M or 0.1 M, as specified. Tris salt was chosen for this study since its ionization constant is not altered by pressure [16]. Pressure-induced changes in the ionization states of the protein arise as a direct result of pressure on the protein and do not involve the surrounding solvent, since Tris, regardless of its buffering power, is insensitive to pressure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tris/HCl was chosen as buffer since the concentration of hydrogen ions in this system is almost independent of pressure [14]. The actual paH in 40% ethylene glycol was estimated according to procedures published elsewhere [15].…”
Section: Enzyme and Buffermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seed crystals were prepared as follows. A suspension of GI crystals (Hampton Research Co., Ltd., HR7-100), containing 0.91 M ammonium sulfate and 1 mM magnesium sulfate in 6 mM tris hydrochloride buffer (pH = 7.0) (Tris-HCl is known as the most insensitive buffer to pressure) (Neuman et al, 1973), was dissolved (~ 33 mg mL -1 ) and filtered (Suzuki et al, 2002b). Then the filtrate was transferred onto the sapphire window and sealed with an o-ring and a glass slide.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%