2007
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610734104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of thermal transport properties

Abstract: Pressure (P) derivatives of thermal conductivity (k) and thermal diffusivity (D) are important to geophysics but are difficult to measure accurately because minerals, being hard and partially transparent, likely incur systematic errors through thermal losses at interfaces and spurious radiative transfer. To evaluate accuracy, repeat experiments for olivine [(Mg0.9Fe0.1)2SiO4], quartz (SiO2), and NaCl are examined in detail: these and other data on electrical insulators are compared with theory. At ambient cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
86
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
7
86
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental measurements are challenging and have not been attempted above 40 GPa [4]. The predictions of Debye theory are strongly model dependent with estimated values of the isothermal logarithmic density derivative a ranging from 4 to 8 [5][6][7], leading to uncertainties in the extrapolated value of the thermal conductivity at the base of the mantle of a factor of 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental measurements are challenging and have not been attempted above 40 GPa [4]. The predictions of Debye theory are strongly model dependent with estimated values of the isothermal logarithmic density derivative a ranging from 4 to 8 [5][6][7], leading to uncertainties in the extrapolated value of the thermal conductivity at the base of the mantle of a factor of 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It ranges between 5 W/mK and 10 W/mK (21,22). The high value results from a linear increase throughout the mantle, but it is also suggested that the slope is proportional to the inverse of bulk modulus, leading to a flattening profile at high pressure (23). Here, we use a parabolic profile reaching 5 W/mK at the CMB.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the P − κ RT relationship cannot be explained based on these alone. To support this argument, we fitted our P − κ RT data, adapting the expression proposed by Hofmeister [34]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ρ and ρ 0 are mass densities at applied pressure and with no applied pressure, respectively. This model assumes the change in group velocity can be approximated by the change in bulk sound velocity [34]. For T ¼ 300 K, T=T o ¼ 1, and κ 0 ¼ 2113 W=m-K, the resulting κ RT using Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation