2017
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201715101002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of the static structure of liquid GeTe based on ab initio molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: Abstract.We have investigated the pressure dependence of the static structure of liquid GeTe based on ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. The pressure range is between ambient pressure and 250 GPa, and their temperatures between 1000 K and 4000 K, which keep the liquid state. In this study, we found two transition stages caused by the compression. At the first stage, below 12 GPa, atomic distances elongate and Peierls-type distortion is dissolved with increasing pressure. At the second stage, above 12 GP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 15 ] However, as is generally known, long simulation time is required to obtain thermal conductivity with high statistical accuracy. [ 16,17 ] Therefore, it is extremely difficult to calculate the ionic thermal conductivity from NEMD and EMD simulations based on FPMD despite a powerful tool which gives accurate physical properties, e.g., structure factor, [ 18,19 ] dielectric constant, [ 20,21 ] and electronic density of states. [ 22 ] In contrast, CMD using the empirical potential is possible to calculate the ionic thermal conductivity with sufficient statistical accuracy because its computational cost is lower than that of FPMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 15 ] However, as is generally known, long simulation time is required to obtain thermal conductivity with high statistical accuracy. [ 16,17 ] Therefore, it is extremely difficult to calculate the ionic thermal conductivity from NEMD and EMD simulations based on FPMD despite a powerful tool which gives accurate physical properties, e.g., structure factor, [ 18,19 ] dielectric constant, [ 20,21 ] and electronic density of states. [ 22 ] In contrast, CMD using the empirical potential is possible to calculate the ionic thermal conductivity with sufficient statistical accuracy because its computational cost is lower than that of FPMD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%