1976
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.14.3516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of the energy gap in some I-III-VI2compound semiconductors

Abstract: The shifts in the absorption edge with hydrostatic pressure have been measured for four ternary semiconductors. In all cases the energy gap increases with pressure. From the data the pressure dependence of the energy gap (dE,/dP) was determined as 2.2 meV/kbar for AgGaS2, 3.4 meV/kbar for CuGaS"5.3 meV/kbar for AgGaSe, , and 2.7 meV/kbar for AgInSe, . These shifts are compared with the corresponding II-VI compounds and discussed. Some optical effects associated with the pressure-induced phase transitions in so… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 lists the resultant values for the chalcopyrite pressure, while in Table 3 we compare the chalcopyrite pressure coefficients with those of the corresponding III-V compounds (the two partial derivatives ∂η/∂ ln V and ∂u/∂ ln V are, of course, both zero in the zinc-blende compounds). In general, we find quite good agreement between the experimental [5][6][7][8][9] and other calculated [10] band-gap pressure coefficients in the chalcopyrite compounds. We see from Table 2 that the main contribution to a p of the chalcopyrite compounds comes from the direct volume deformation potential term (∂E g /∂ ln V), while the remaining two terms in Eq.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 lists the resultant values for the chalcopyrite pressure, while in Table 3 we compare the chalcopyrite pressure coefficients with those of the corresponding III-V compounds (the two partial derivatives ∂η/∂ ln V and ∂u/∂ ln V are, of course, both zero in the zinc-blende compounds). In general, we find quite good agreement between the experimental [5][6][7][8][9] and other calculated [10] band-gap pressure coefficients in the chalcopyrite compounds. We see from Table 2 that the main contribution to a p of the chalcopyrite compounds comes from the direct volume deformation potential term (∂E g /∂ ln V), while the remaining two terms in Eq.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…(iv) In III-V compounds, a p increases significantly as the anion atomic number increases [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. We have investigated a p theoretically in these materials and found good agreement between theoretical and experimental values [5][6][7][8][9][10]. We explain why a p is smaller and more cation dependent in chalcopyrites than in III-V compounds and why a p increases with the anion atomic number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, the energy band gap of all these compounds is found to increase with pressure. This increase has been observed experimentally by Jayaraman et al [12] and this leads to the conclusion that the bottom of the conduction band must be rising in energy with pressure. Hence, the pressure coefficient dE g adP is found to be positive.…”
Section: Variation Of Energy Gap With Pressurementioning
confidence: 69%
“…GaInP 2 , is equal to 8.8 × 10 -2 eV/GPa [4]. This reduction in the bandgap pressure coefficient between a chalcopyrite semiconductor and its zincblende analogue has been observed also in the I-III -VI 2 chalcopyrites [5].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%