1998
DOI: 10.1021/la9805692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure Dependence of the Critical Micelle Concentration of a Nonionic Surfactant in Water Studied by 1H-NMR

Abstract: The critical micelle concentration (cmc) of the nonionic surfactant C8E5 in D2O was measured at 30 °C and pressures up to 350 MPa using 1H-NMR chemical shifts. The cmc was found to increase with pressure up to approximately 150 MPa and then decrease at higher pressures. This characteristic pressure dependence is similar to that reported for several ionic surfactant solutions and is in quantitative agreement with the effect of pressure on the transfer of hydrocarbons from water into nonpolar solvents. We conclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cmc values of various surfactants including CTAB, SDS, Triton X-100, Brij-35, Brij-700, Tween-20, SB-12, SB3-10 determined by this method agree very well with those determined by other methods. Because water has strong absorption in the same region as the surfactants used in this study, the cmc values were determined in D 2 O. cmc values in D 2 O are known to be different from those in water [16][17][18][19]. However, the differences are very small and in some cases can be considered to be insignificant within experimental error [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cmc values of various surfactants including CTAB, SDS, Triton X-100, Brij-35, Brij-700, Tween-20, SB-12, SB3-10 determined by this method agree very well with those determined by other methods. Because water has strong absorption in the same region as the surfactants used in this study, the cmc values were determined in D 2 O. cmc values in D 2 O are known to be different from those in water [16][17][18][19]. However, the differences are very small and in some cases can be considered to be insignificant within experimental error [16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because water has strong absorption in the same region as the surfactants used in this study, the cmc values were determined in D 2 O. cmc values in D 2 O are known to be different from those in water [16][17][18][19]. However, the differences are very small and in some cases can be considered to be insignificant within experimental error [16][17][18][19]. More importantly is the fact that the method can be used for the direct determination of cmc values of various nonionic surfactants in room-temperature ionic liquids including [BMIm] + [PF 6 ] − and [EMIm] + [Tf 2 N] − .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that the observed chemical shift of a probe nucleus remains constant at concentrations below C CM for a non-ionic surfactant in water. 19 Compounds having rigid aromatic structures are believed to typically associate by nonmicellar processes involving face-to-face stacking of molecules. 20 In the present study, a spectral shift for the H6 proton was observed even at very low concentrations, although the changes were more pronounced at concentrations above 10 mg/ mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter can be scrutinized against the published data on the pressure dependences of the critical micelle concentrations of ionic and nonionic surfactants, including sodium alkylsulfates, alkyltrimethylammonium bromides, and n-alkyl polyoxyethylene ethers. [49][50][51][52][53][54][55] The critical micelle concentration of these surfactants exhibits an initial increase with pressure followed by a decrease with a maximum at around 1 kbar. This behavior is in satisfactory agreement with the pressure dependence of the free energy change we have calculated for the transfer of methylene groups from water to a micelle, which shows a maximum of ΔG at around 0.6 kbar.…”
Section: Water-inaccessible Structural Regions In the Pressure-inducementioning
confidence: 99%