1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(98)00163-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of subharmonic signals from contrast microbubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

19
213
2
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
19
213
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the same interval, the energy of the subharmonic component is reduced by 9.2 dB. Both these observations correspond well to the results presented in [6] and [14]. However, the fluctuating nature and the overall decrease in energy seen in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the same interval, the energy of the subharmonic component is reduced by 9.2 dB. Both these observations correspond well to the results presented in [6] and [14]. However, the fluctuating nature and the overall decrease in energy seen in Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The subharmonic component seems to drop from the beginning of the experiment to the end. According to Shi and colleagues [6], [14], this was expected for the first six measurement points. But the fact that the energy continues to drop for at least the next two measurement points (p ov = [20 15] kPa) could indicate that the bubbles are being dissolved.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Current investigations in this field use the assumption that changes of the ambient pressure alter significantly the bubble dimensions; consequently their resonant frequency is changed, resulting in changes in the characteristics of backscattered signal. Using harmonic and sub-harmonic frequencies instead of resonant original frequency, allows to exclude artifacts from the surrounding media and to improve signal-to-noise ratio [3].The current paper conducts comparative analysis of the pressure sensitivity of some UCA, using computer simulation. It also evaluates the parameter best correlated to the ambient pressure, using both computer simulation and 'in-vitro' experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%