2017
DOI: 10.1080/08957959.2017.1318131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence of melting temperature and shear modulus of hcp-iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since many applications for thermodynamic EOS involve materials subjected to extreme pressures (e.g., in geophysical research, 29 ) it is natural to inquire whether there are pressure limits beyond which the DFT-derived EOS are no longer valid. A rough measure of these limits is given by comparing the maximal value found in the literature for pressure exerted on a material to that reached by the DFT simulation.…”
Section: Benchmarking To Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since many applications for thermodynamic EOS involve materials subjected to extreme pressures (e.g., in geophysical research, 29 ) it is natural to inquire whether there are pressure limits beyond which the DFT-derived EOS are no longer valid. A rough measure of these limits is given by comparing the maximal value found in the literature for pressure exerted on a material to that reached by the DFT simulation.…”
Section: Benchmarking To Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Email address: hongnguyenhdu86@gmail.com https//doi.org/ 10.25073/2588-1124/vnumap.4382 phases at high pressure provide essential information to investigate complex seismic structures inside the Earth's core [6][7]. The investigation of melting of iron under high pressure has been performed by different theoretical methods (ab initio calculations [8], molecular dynamic simulations [9], empirical approach [10][11][12]) and experimental measurements (laser-heated diamond-anvil cell [13][14][15], shock compression [16]). However, up to now, the results obtained from different methods are still not unified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%