1993
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3697(93)90119-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure dependence and thermal quenching of chromium photoluminescence in Cs2NaYCl6:Cr3+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, pressure‐dependent luminescence energy differences have been recorded for many solid chromium(III) materials . The best known example is ruby itself, with a pressure‐induced red shift of the R 1 line luminescence ( 2 E→ 4 A 2 ) on the order of −0.7 cm −1 kbar −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, pressure‐dependent luminescence energy differences have been recorded for many solid chromium(III) materials . The best known example is ruby itself, with a pressure‐induced red shift of the R 1 line luminescence ( 2 E→ 4 A 2 ) on the order of −0.7 cm −1 kbar −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure sensitivity of the broadband 4 T 2 → 4 A 2 transition as a function of the bulk modulus B 0 of a series of Cr 3+ -activated crystals of different nature (chlorides, fluorides, , and oxides , ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a slope of −χ bulk = −3.8 × 10 -3 kbar -1 . , This illustrates that the local compressibility at the TiCl 6 4- dopant site is roughly a factor of 4 lower than the compressibility of the NaCl host material. Several previous pressure studies on transition-metal-doped inorganic systems have focused on the differences between the local compressibility of the optically active unit and the bulk compressibility of the host. , Often, the conclusion was reached that the basic assumption of the point charge model, namely, that 10 Dq ∝ R - n with n = 5, is slightly incorrect, and consequently n was estimated to adopt values between 4.5 and 6, depending on the system. Other studies relate the differences between χ loc and χ bulk to size differences between dopant ion and substituted host ions . None of these two explanations alone can satisfactorily account for the factor of 4 difference between χ loc and χ bulk in Ti 2+ :NaCl.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%