2012
DOI: 10.1029/2012ja017791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure anisotropy in global magnetospheric simulations: A magnetohydrodynamics model

Abstract: [1] In order to better describe the space plasmas where pressure anisotropy has prominent effects, we extend the BATS-R-US magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) model to include anisotropic pressure. We implement the anisotropic MHD equations under the double adiabatic approximation with an additional pressure relaxation term into BATS-R-US and perform global magnetospheric simulations. The results from idealized magnetospheric simulations confirm previous studies: pressure anisotropy widens the magnetosheath, increases … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another factor is that global ideal MHD simulations cannot produce as intense a plasma depletion layer (PDL) [Zwan and Wolf, 1976] as observed. This may owe to ion kinetic or pressure anisotropy effects being important to generate PDLs, as noted by Meng et al [2012].…”
Section: Magnetosheath Flows and Magnetopause Shape: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another factor is that global ideal MHD simulations cannot produce as intense a plasma depletion layer (PDL) [Zwan and Wolf, 1976] as observed. This may owe to ion kinetic or pressure anisotropy effects being important to generate PDLs, as noted by Meng et al [2012].…”
Section: Magnetosheath Flows and Magnetopause Shape: Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of modelling of the pressure-anisotropy effect on dynamics advocated by Mogavero & Schekochihin (2014) (see also Samsonov et al 2001;Schekochihin & Cowley 2006;Lyutikov 2007;Kunz et al 2011), as well as in various numerical implementations of effective closures ensuring that ∆ does not stray into the unstable regimes (3) and (4) (Sharma et al 2006(Sharma et al , 2007Samsonov et al 2007;Chandran et al 2011;Meng et al 2012;Kunz et al 2012;Santos-Lima et al 2014), rests on the assumption that, as the magnetic field is locally increased (decreased), the system will stray into mirror (firehose) unstable regimes, instabilities will instantly produce corresponding fluctuations, those will saturate and adjust the instability thresholds (or the system's position with respect to them). This adjustment is assumed to happen very quickly compared to the time scale on which the system might switch from one instability threshold to the other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest collisionless MHD-type approximation is the CGL-MHD model (Chew et al 1956). A modified CGL-MHD model taking into account the anisotropy constraints due to kinetic instabilities has been used for modeling the solar wind and magnetosphere in numerical simulations (Denton et al 1994;Pudovkin et al 1999;Samsonov & Pudovkin 2000;Samsonov et al 2001Samsonov et al , 2007Meng et al 2012aMeng et al , 2012b; see also Chandran et al 2011 where a higher order fluid model is used).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%