1979
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/30.2.255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pressure and Solute Potentials in Stomatal Cells ofTradescantia virginiana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
30
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
8
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although 9 is teehnically difficult to measure, it has been estimated for Tradescantia virginiana to be between 1 -6 and 2-0 (Meidner & Edwards 1975;Meidner & Bannister 1979). These data are consistent with a theoretical analysis (Cooke et al 1976) that suggested a value of about 1 -5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Although 9 is teehnically difficult to measure, it has been estimated for Tradescantia virginiana to be between 1 -6 and 2-0 (Meidner & Edwards 1975;Meidner & Bannister 1979). These data are consistent with a theoretical analysis (Cooke et al 1976) that suggested a value of about 1 -5.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In previous studies (7) using the same plant material, however, these psychrometers exhibited a much wider range of measured leaf water potentials, and even for the most resistive samples an equilibration time of the order of minutes for water vapor exchange between the leaf surface and the psychrometer. Although the estimate of within leaf hydraulic conductivity presented in this study (3)(4)(5) (8) and the epidermis to guard cell complex level (3,4). In general, these hypothesis suggest that stomata are situated at or near the end of the gradient and will experience greater changes in water potential for a given change in evaporative demand than the bulk leaf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The simple quantitative relationship between guard cell turgor (P g ), epidermal (or subsidiary) cell turgor (P e ), and stomatal aperture (a), which defines the operational potential of all stomata, is known for only a few species, and most of these have structurally similar stomata (Meidner and Bannister, 1979;Franks et al, 1998. No such data are available for the distinctive ''dumb-bell''-shaped stomata of grasses, for example, or for the more mechanically isolated stomata that are common in many pteridophytes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%